Teams

IE-Vista Murrieta-Harned

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-02-29vs IE-BC-BorresenWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoanne Harned / Nath Sayasane vs Sue Pruitt / Sungjin Renouf4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-02-11vs IE-TCC-YarterLost 02
L#1 SinglesApril Mays vs Veronica Saucedo7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTessie Rivera / Teryl Deigan vs Kathy Wilkinson / Diane Hom0-6, 3-6
2024-02-10vs IE-MTC-ShelterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesApril Mays / Tessie Rivera vs Karen Martinez / Joan Greene4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSheila Forgerson / Joanne Harned vs Kelsey Cane / Andrea Van Soest5-7, 2-6
2024-02-04vs IE-LLW-Andulka-GeigerWon 10
W#1 DoublesTessie Rivera / April Mays vs Ilse Ungeheuer / Nova Gray7-5, 6-1
2024-01-28vs IE-Redlands-Don YoungLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoanne Harned / Tessie Rivera vs Terri Burchinal / Lisa Contreras6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesApril Mays / Jeanie Thacker vs Laura Hibbard / Connie DeLong1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-01-13vs IE-CCCC-KayLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarla Gonzalez / Joanne Harned vs Amy Taylor / Heidi Brun6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
April Mays
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Joanne Harned
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Darla Gonzalez
published 3.5
3.17
Juliet Fisher
published
3.13
Jeanie Thacker
published
3.10
Nath Sayasane
published
3.06
Teryl Deigan
published
3.06
Tessie Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Toni McAllister
published
2.81
Elvira Schlanger
published 3
Sofie Carpenter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanne Harned + Tessie Rivera8955% games+5.2% vs expected
Joanne Harned + Darla Gonzalez3247% games−6.2% vs expected
Joanne Harned + April Mays7256% gamesnot enough data
Tessie Rivera + April Mays3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
April Mays
47W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Joanne Harned
52W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Darla Gonzalez
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
Juliet Fisher
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
Jeanie Thacker
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.13
Nath Sayasane
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
Teryl Deigan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
32%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Tessie Rivera
92W–111L career · 4 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
Toni McAllister
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Elvira Schlanger
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
2.81
Sofie Carpenter
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.