Teams

Ca.Conzola55C7.5

2026 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-24vs Di.Sauer55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesJane Hunter / Gillian Kelleher vs Tobi Buckley / Diane Sauer6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Brigham / Laura Davidson vs Kristine Potter / Virgina Wilson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarina Barthalmus / Camille Conzola vs Amy Merdes / Phyllis Soltz6-0, 6-3
2026-08-17vs Su.Knowles55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesJane Hunter / Lisa Kempf vs Carol Muth / Roseanne Orman6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHelen Cuccaro / Erin McAllister vs Cindy Faltisco / Lynn Trefzger6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCamille Conzola / Laura Davidson vs Susanne Knowles / Leigh Magee6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Erin McAllister
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Nikki DAmbrose
published 4
3.68
Jane Hunter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Theresa Stone
published
3.49
Dara Haney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Lisa Kempf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Camille Conzola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Marina Barthalmus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Julie Brigham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Helen Cuccaro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Gillian Kelleher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marina Barthalmus + Gillian Kelleher12753% games+10.8% vs expected
Lisa Kempf + Marina Barthalmus4647% games−5.3% vs expected
Camille Conzola + Lisa Kempf6552% games−5.6% vs expected
Camille Conzola + Marina Barthalmus4354% gamesnot enough data
Helen Cuccaro + Nikki DAmbrose314 matchesnot enough data
Camille Conzola + Gillian Kelleher224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Kempf + Gillian Kelleher314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin McAllister
26W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Nikki DAmbrose
308W–267L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Jane Hunter
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Theresa Stone
8W–21L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
3.5
Dara Haney
188W–138L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Lisa Kempf
365W–300L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
3.5
Camille Conzola
258W–178L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Marina Barthalmus
218W–213L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Julie Brigham
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Helen Cuccaro
129W–198L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Gillian Kelleher
165W–164L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.