Teams

BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 18AW3.5A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Nadiia Gazda
published
3.50
Sara Weaver
published
3.49
Shelley Scott
published
3.43
Katherine Hwang
published
3.40
Twinee Madan
published
3.38
Sherri Glenn
published
3.37
Danielle Bromberg
published 3.5
3.26
Tonya Vincent
published
3.26
Sharon Yee
published
Alisha Lewis
published 3.5
3.18
Pamela Bohlmann
published
3.17
Zeljka Lemaster
published
3.14
Monica Reid
published
3.11
Jing Gu
published
3.07
2.99
Tammy Nurisso
published
2.95
Lisa Cortopassi
published
2.74
Linda Collins
published
2.66
Abbe Braitman
published 3
2.65
Midori Lucas
published
2.54
Lowrie MacLean
published
Pearl Renaker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherri Glenn + Tonya Vincent5451% games+1.4% vs expected
Tammy Nurisso + Linda Collins134 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Scott + Tonya Vincent213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nadiia Gazda
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.72
Sara Weaver
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Shelley Scott
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Katherine Hwang
36W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
Twinee Madan
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.40
Sherri Glenn
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Danielle Bromberg
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
Tonya Vincent
19W–18L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
Sharon Yee
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Alisha Lewis
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pamela Bohlmann
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Zeljka Lemaster
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Monica Reid
3W–18L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.14
Jing Gu
14W–29L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke
8W–25L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Tammy Nurisso
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
Lisa Cortopassi
5W–18L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.95
Linda Collins
2W–15L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Abbe Braitman
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
Midori Lucas
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Alexandra Bernardini
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
Lowrie MacLean
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pearl Renaker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.