Teams

BRMST GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

4 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesJanine Huber / Lisa Francisco vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-02vs MEA GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Francisco / Erin Johnson vs Shannon Ross / Brendan Ash6-3, 6-2
2022-05-29vs TTA BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesKelly O'Brien / Tabitha Bartel vs Nohemi Almaraz / Kim Degney6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLisa Francisco vs Lisa Shaver4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLeigh Harris / Erin Johnson vs SONJA STANLEY / Kristen Womer2-6, 2-6
2022-05-18vs CVTA REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanine Huber / Kelly O'Brien vs Marica Follett / Tanya Nicholson6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTabitha Bartel vs Xiaorui Li4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLeigh Harris / Lisa Francisco vs Amie Elcan / Mary Campbell6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-05-11vs RMTC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Johnson / Lisa Francisco vs Dawn Bradford / Andrea Norris6-3, 7-5
2022-05-02vs MEA GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly O'Brien / Tabitha Bartel vs Lauren Noyes / Kim Congedo6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJanine Huber vs Marianne Martin6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLeigh Harris / Lisa Francisco vs Kate Ruder / Brendan Ash6-2, 7-5
2022-04-20vs TTA BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanine Huber / Kelly O'Brien vs Lisa Shaver / Kristen Womer6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Francisco / Erin Johnson vs SONJA STANLEY / Kim Degney7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Janine Huber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.83
Tabitha Bartel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.43
Erin Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.05
Lisa Francisco
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Francisco + Erin Johnson131848% games−3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Janine Huber
85W–74L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Tabitha Bartel
43W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
2.5
Erin Johnson
42W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%71%29%
2.43
Lisa Francisco
39W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.