Teams

Loupe/18/3.5/WD/BOC

2023 City Championship 18 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 (18&O) Women Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5 (18&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jeansonne/18/WD/BOC71301026268
2Kozar/18/3.5/WD/UC71281228300
3Bordelon/18/3.5/WD/BREC53241636324
4Sellers/18/3.5/WD/CCLA53241639330
5Bogan/18/3.5/WD/BRCC53241640329
6Loupe/18/3.5/WD/BOC35122861411
7Moody/18/3.5/WD/BREC26142656397
8Johnson/18/3.5/WD/YMCA26112964432
9Labbe/18/3.5/WD/BREC08132757415

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
3.32
Debora K Hartman
published 3.5
3.15
Brenda Saltz
published 3.5
3.07
Wendy Richardson
published
2.97
Toni Kinchen
published
2.93
Phyllis Pedersen
published
2.87
Mary Raborn
published
2.82
Michele Bienvenu
published
Jan Cox
published 3
2.73
Rachelle Trahan
published
2.60
Carolyn Elofson
published 3
2.54
Donna Embree
published 3
Linda Knecht
published
Mimi Loupe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Toni Kinchen + Mary Raborn6259% games+5.4% vs expected
Debora K Hartman + Phyllis Pedersen5255% games+0.9% vs expected
Michele Bienvenu + Linda Knecht4443% games−4.6% vs expected
Mary Raborn + Rachelle Trahan8847% games−5.6% vs expected
Clarice Cricket Gordon + Debora K Hartman2353% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Elofson + Phyllis Pedersen224 matchesnot enough data
Toni Kinchen + Jan Cox033 matchesnot enough data
Jan Cox + Michele Bienvenu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Clarice Cricket Gordon
50W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Debora K Hartman
31W–29L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Brenda Saltz
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Wendy Richardson
11W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
Toni Kinchen
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
Phyllis Pedersen
32W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
Mary Raborn
19W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87
Michele Bienvenu
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Jan Cox
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachelle Trahan
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Carolyn Elofson
25W–29L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Donna Embree
12W–17L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
Linda Knecht
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mimi Loupe
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.