Teams

WCC

2023 Shenandoah Combo · Shenandoah 6.5 Combo Weekday Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.06 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-19vs Sweet ShotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesCristina Mantell / Betsy Gowdy vs Gretchen Leitch / Lynn Colavita6-4, 6-3
2023-09-12vs Combo MamboLost 12
W#1 DoublesCristina Mantell / Rachel Hahn vs Jeanne Dattilo / Karen Gettier6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Lou Daylor / Lauren Johnson vs HEATHER HUGHES / Christeen Tolle2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Browning / Rhonda Madison vs Kimberly Butler / Angela Kane3-6, 2-6
2023-09-05vs Love2PlayWon 10
W#1 DoublesCristina Mantell / Adelaide Turnbull vs Page Groseclose / Leslie Boyd6-0, 6-0
2023-08-29vs Sweet ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCristina Mantell / Rachel Hahn vs Gretchen Leitch / Lisa Phaneuf1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-08-15vs Ace KickersLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Lou Daylor / Lauren Johnson vs Ellen Gibbons / Jennifer Schneider1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRhonda Madison / Betsy Gowdy vs Elizabeth Messner / Taylor Marr6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-08-08vs Combo MamboSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCristina Mantell / Mary Lou Daylor vs Jeanne Dattilo / Janann Mercker6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRoberta Patton / Rhonda Madison vs Kelly Stanley / Kimberly Fulham7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesCristina Mantell / Mary Lou Daylor vs Robin Sweet / Joan Cestaro6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah 6.5 Combo Weekday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Cristina Mantell
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.09
Rachel Hahn
published
3.02
Mary Lou Daylor
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.02
2.85
Sarah Browning
published
2.79
Debra Farrell
published 3
2.73
Betsy Gowdy
published 3
2.73
Ann Pawlak
published 3
2.63
Rhonda Madison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Christine Scully
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Farrell + Rhonda Madison5945% games+0.8% vs expected
Rhonda Madison + Mary Lou Daylor4157% gamesnot enough data
Betsy Gowdy + Mary Lou Daylor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cristina Mantell
104W–92L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Rachel Hahn
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Mary Lou Daylor
44W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Adelaide Turnbull
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.02
Sarah Browning
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Debra Farrell
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Betsy Gowdy
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Ann Pawlak
3W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Rhonda Madison
41W–78L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.63
2.5
Christine Scully
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.