Teams

LTFCS RYALS

2022 TRIO - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.69 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-23vs CSRC VANEVERYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnnette Markert / Terri Plummer vs Stephanie King / Vikki ONeil6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Michon / Rachel Rocks vs Stephanie Brock / Jenny McCabe6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-16vs FLYHS LEVKUSLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Schafer / Tatiana Merkoulova vs Kristi Creps / Jamie Roach2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Rocks / Anne Ryals vs Kay Patterson / Chelsey Wright5-7, 5-7
2022-04-09vs PBTC TUCKERSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTerri Plummer vs Rebecca VanBuskirk4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVicki Gess / Sara Michon vs Paula Henson / Margaret Knight6-3, 6-3
2022-03-19Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDaria Parker / Laura Schafer vs Salome D'Silva / Cindy Yetter5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Gess / Anne Ryals vs Ann Grumann / Jennifer Madden1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Debra Orton
published 4
3.70
Rachel Rocks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Laura Schafer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Sara Michon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Tatiana Merkoulova
published
3.38
Terri Plummer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Annette Markert
published 3.5
3.21
Anne Ryals
published 3.5
2.97
Vicki Gess
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Daria Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Michon + Laura Schafer314 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Rocks + Daria Parker123 matchesnot enough data
Vicki Gess + Terri Plummer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debra Orton
5W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Rachel Rocks
40W–75L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Laura Schafer
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Sara Michon
83W–94L career · 2 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
Tatiana Merkoulova
17W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Terri Plummer
57W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Annette Markert
17W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Anne Ryals
24W–19L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Vicki Gess
54W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
Daria Parker
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.