Teams

Women Flight A

2025 Holding League · Women

24 players · average NTRP 3.82 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Women Flight A000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Cyndi Jones
published 4.5
3.86
Lindsay Knight
published
3.77
Athelia Graham
published 4
Heidi Maxfield
published 4
3.69
3.65
Tammie Pearson
published 4
3.58
Tessa Gurney
published 4
3.56
Megan Bewsey
published 4
3.53
Janee Roper
published 4
3.47
Simone McInnis
published 4
3.45
Jody Neuman
published 4
3.35
Emily Kelly
published
3.25
Julie Labrum
published
3.21
Heather Berger
published
3.16
Lynette Wills
published 3.5
3.08
Carolyn Cottle
published 3.5
Karlene Johnston
published 3
2.75
Melissa Reoch
published 3
2.00
Sabrina Vienneau
published
Kavitha Jayakumar
published
Kristie Smith
published
Michele Smith
published
Patricia Kipp
published
Sundi Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Labrum + Heidi Maxfield033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cyndi Jones
154W–124L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Lindsay Knight
105W–41L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Athelia Graham
58W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Heidi Maxfield
127W–86L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Nanette Brockbank
79W–91L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Tammie Pearson
40W–39L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.65
4
Tessa Gurney
60W–62L career · type A · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Megan Bewsey
37W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.56
4
Janee Roper
146W–123L career · type A · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Simone McInnis
99W–76L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
4
Jody Neuman
51W–44L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
Emily Kelly
22W–24L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Julie Labrum
102W–99L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Heather Berger
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Lynette Wills
43W–46L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Carolyn Cottle
113W–130L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
3
Karlene Johnston
131W–109L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Melissa Reoch
90W–77L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Sabrina Vienneau
5W–30L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Kavitha Jayakumar
14W–24L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristie Smith
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Smith
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Kipp
17W–44L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sundi Brown
36W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.