Teams

Shot Sisters

Winter Adult 55 & Over Doubles · Ladies 7.0 55+

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-03-27vs Great GetsLost 01
L#2 DoublesGeovanna Ricaldi / Vicki Jones vs Caren Steele / Kathy Mungle3-6, 4-6
2022-02-13vs Great GetsWon 10
W#1 DoublesVicki Jones / Angela Waterman vs Kathy Mungle / Beth Rowley4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 7.0 55+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Angela Waterman
published 4
3.31
Stacy Kelly Girton
published
3.31
Vicki Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Petra Utter
published
3.22
Lori Julian
published
3.20
Vicky Wells
published
3.19
Jan Rockwell
published
3.16
Geovanna Ricaldi
published 3.5
3.12
Fran Lefkowitz
published 3.5
Gail Lotak
published
Kim Harris
published
Mary Stephens
published
Nancy Guggenbickler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicky Wells + Jan Rockwell3256% games+9.8% vs expected
Vicki Jones + Jan Rockwell6255% games−2.1% vs expected
Petra Utter + Kim Harris8259% gamesnot enough data
Vicki Jones + Lori Julian4257% gamesnot enough data
Stacy Kelly Girton + Kim Harris5062% gamesnot enough data
Vicki Jones + Vicky Wells314 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Kelly Girton + Angela Waterman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Waterman
40W–74L career · type A · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Stacy Kelly Girton
57W–29L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Vicki Jones
113W–95L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Petra Utter
60W–26L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Lori Julian
16W–23L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Vicky Wells
26W–33L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
Jan Rockwell
70W–85L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Geovanna Ricaldi
31W–29L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Fran Lefkowitz
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
Gail Lotak
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Harris
53W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Stephens
27W–36L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Guggenbickler
5W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.