Teams

La.Willliams55S

2026 Capital Singles 55 & Over · 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-03vs Mi.Elstob55SLost 03
L#1 SinglesMitch Strobin vs Vincent Conzola6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesPaul Brinckerhoff vs Timothy Koves2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesWest Ludwig vs Ken Glanville6-7, 3-6
2026-07-29vs Je.Miller55SWon 21
L#1 SinglesRod Boyle vs John Hulicki4-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesPaul Brinckerhoff vs Joseph Roney6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMitch Strobin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-13vs Mi.Elstob55SWon 21
W#1 SinglesWest Ludwig vs Ken Glanville6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesEvan Fultz vs Vincent Conzola6-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesMitch Strobin vs Mike Elstob6-3, 6-0
2026-06-29vs Je.Miller55SWon 21
L#1 SinglesLance Williams vs John Hulicki3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesWest Ludwig vs Lewis Carroll6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesRod Boyle vs Joseph Roney6-2, 7-6
2026-06-22vs Mi.Elstob55SLost 03
L#1 SinglesPaul Brinckerhoff vs Mike Elstob2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesWest Ludwig vs Ken Glanville6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesEvan Fultz vs Timothy Koves3-6, 3-6
2026-06-08vs Je.Miller55SWon 21
W#1 SinglesMitch Strobin vs David Clark6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesEvan Fultz vs John Hulicki2-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesLance Williams vs Stephen Cole6-0, 6-1
2026-06-01vs Mi.Elstob55SWon 21
W#1 SinglesLance Williams vs David Ferris6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesPaul Brinckerhoff vs Ken Glanville3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRod Boyle vs Philip Robertson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-05-18vs Je.Miller55SWon 30
W#1 SinglesWest Ludwig vs David Clark6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesMitch Strobin vs Joseph Roney6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesEvan Fultz vs Jeffrey Miller6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mi.Elstob55S6218618188
2La.Willliams55S62131124194
3Je.Miller55S0851938257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Mitch Strobin
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Evan Fultz
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
West Ludwig
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.23
Lance Williams
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.20
Paul Brinckerhoff
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Rod Boyle
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lance Williams + Paul Brinckerhoff3249% gamesnot enough data
Paul Brinckerhoff + Evan Fultz134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mitch Strobin
123W–70L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Evan Fultz
115W–109L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
West Ludwig
8W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Lance Williams
81W–80L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Paul Brinckerhoff
93W–99L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Rod Boyle
64W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.