Teams

Team 2 RJ Tennis All Stars

2021 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Men 3.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-03-31Split 11
L#1 DoublesDaniel Kim / Daniel Aronowitz vs Ric Canizales / Randolph Harrill6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesStephen Dupuy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-03-25vs Team 4 Serve-AcesLost 01
L#1 SinglesStephen Dupuy vs Nabil Ghadiali3-6, 2-6
2021-03-20vs Team 1 Scared HitlessWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephen Dupuy / ERIC Levine vs Curtis Fisher / Alberto Zapata6-2, 6-3
2021-03-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesStephen Dupuy vs James Robberstad6-4, 5-3
2021-03-07vs Team 3 MenaceLost 01
L#2 DoublesGary Crum / Daniel Aronowitz vs Ric Canizales / Arturo Garcia Alonso0-6, 6-0, 0-1
2021-03-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesStephen Dupuy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-03-03vs Team 1 Scared HitlessWon 20
W#1 DoublesDaniel Aronowitz / Daniel Kim vs John Back / James Rentsch6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesStephen Dupuy vs Jonathan Franko6-1, 6-1
2021-02-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesStephen Dupuy vs Douglas Thede4-6, 5-4
2021-02-21vs Team 5 Unstrung HeroesWon 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Aronowitz / Gary Crum vs Lawrence Anderson / Rob Wright6-4, 6-2
2021-02-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesStephen Dupuy vs Ashwin Joshi7-6, 3-2
2021-01-24vs Team 5 Unstrung HeroesLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Aronowitz / Joe Miscione vs Craig Pickering / Edwin McNicholas3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesStephen Dupuy vs Edward Naidich3-6, 3-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Stephen Dupuy
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.09
ERIC Levine
published 3.5
Daniel Aronowitz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
John Zott
published 3
2.52
Robert Etheridge
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Etheridge + John Zott51149% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stephen Dupuy
72W–51L career · 9 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
ERIC Levine
1W–6L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Daniel Aronowitz
43W–80L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
John Zott
37W–42L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Robert Etheridge
82W–115L career · type A · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.