Teams

DPollack/Kilduff (Sardis)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 11 9:30 AM
vs
Country Club of the Carolinas
Sep 18 9:30 AM
vs
Sardis Swim & Racquet Club
Sep 25 9:30 AM
vs
Sardis Swim & Racquet Club
Oct 2 9:30 AM
vs
Life Time Athletic Charlotte
2026-09-04vs PRhame/GLiz (Park Road)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Pollack / Bardeen Forman vs Seti Byrd / Juliana Comeau6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMollie Allen / Elizabeth Tabor vs Sarah Farlow / Lydia Parker6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrittany Norman / Judy Kilduff vs Jodi Warner / Gabriela Liz5-7, 6-7
2026-08-28vs KKeen/LMadonna (WSRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesBardeen Forman / Mollie Allen vs Amanda Eagan / Wesley Kuenne3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Spaugh / Miki Osherow vs Randi Kayes / Stacey Herndon6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrittany Norman / Rebecca Spriggs vs Savannah Samuelson / Laurie Madonna0-6, 3-6
2026-08-21vs CPrice (Charlotte Country Club)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Tabor / Brittany Norman vs Laurens Threlkeld / Candace Price6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Kilduff / Melanie Bradle vs Peggy Thies / Lindsay Griffin2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDana Demick / Christina Drogaris vs Quinerly Cowden / Austen Marley5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TMacuga/Sweeney (Park Crossing)3090118
2KDavis/ABroemel (Queens)2060236
3DCallinan/KGibson (Raintree)2051243
4KHudson (Piper Glen)1030017
5AKupchella/AJeter (OPRC)1021334
6IMcLeod (Carmel)1142549
7CSoliday (Jeff Adams)1133652
8GRhew (OPRC)1133760
9SLauer (Brookhaven)1124859
10KDowdy (Piper Glen)12451077
11JKeller (Firethorne)000000
12KKeen/LMadonna (WSRC)000000
13APessina (Carmel)000000
14DPollack/Kilduff (Sardis)000000
15BMalley (Longview)000000
16PRhame/GLiz (Park Road)000000
17YKwon (Life Time)000000
18CPrice (Charlotte Country Club)000000
19SDeVries (PCC)02151066
20ACombs/RMaietta (BCC)02151064
21AFilingeri (OPRC)02151070
22DBurns/SPoplin (Jeff Adams)02061274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Judy Kilduff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Deborah Spaugh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Bardeen Forman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Elizabeth Tabor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Rebecca Spriggs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Susan Crosby
published
2.58
Dana Demick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.55
Mollie Allen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.45
Donna Pollack
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.28
Brittany Norman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.28
Christina Drogaris
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.22
Miki Osherow
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.17
Melanie Bradle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.03
Courtney Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.81
Lory Cobb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Pollack + Miki Osherow3252% games+15.5% vs expected
Donna Pollack + Bardeen Forman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Judy Kilduff
48W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Deborah Spaugh
47W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Bardeen Forman
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Elizabeth Tabor
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Rebecca Spriggs
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Susan Crosby
0W–7L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Dana Demick
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
2.5
Mollie Allen
40W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
2.5
Donna Pollack
21W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Brittany Norman
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Christina Drogaris
5W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Miki Osherow
9W–8L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Melanie Bradle
7W–20L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Courtney Lewis
3W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Lory Cobb
4W–23L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.