Teams

NR Weekend Wanderers

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WE

16 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-06vs Ojai PixiesLost 02
L#2 DoublesLiat Ciardi / Tammy Snyder vs Jamie Culhane / Debra Becker1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Reynolds / Marti Spencer vs Heather Miller / Tahnie Toland1-6, 0-6
2025-04-05vs Arroyo Vista HurricanesLost 12
W#1 DoublesSandy Hutchins / Juliet Walsh vs Sophia McCreary / Stacy Rubeli6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Reynolds / Marti Spencer vs Christy Feinfield / Erin MacKie1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Benton / Liat Ciardi vs Julie Perron / Wendy Schoenburg0-6, 0-6
2025-03-29vs Out of WACLost 01
L#1 DoublesLiat Ciardi / Marti Spencer vs Janet Fang-Putinier / Karen Walker1-6, 3-6
2025-03-01vs Mission Oaks Smart AcesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSonia Bekian / Lisa Iezza vs Ghazala Trotter / Lauren Koenig6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMarti Spencer / Houri Kazanjian vs Paula Medina / Tracee Nilsson3-6, 2-6
2025-02-15vs V -LLW Royally Fun ChaoLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Conversano / Trisha Telford vs Stacey Iwata / Lorene Miller1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLiat Ciardi / Tammy Snyder vs Cindy Baw / Lan Chao0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Benton / Marti Spencer vs Carol Choy / Ana Gorman3-6, 0-6
2025-02-08vs Game Set SunsetLost 02
L#2 DoublesKathy Ferrari / Mary Conversano vs Heather McGregor / Sharon Li6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLiat Ciardi / Angela Reynolds vs Denise Gelfand / Eliza Toone6-7, 3-6
2025-02-02vs MRC Smokin AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Conversano / Diane Merade vs Kathleen Feig / Michelle Jackson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Snyder / Marti Spencer vs Melissa Shanahan / Maureen Weston2-6, 1-6
2025-02-01vs Royal Court QueensLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Conversano / Diane Merade vs Lillian Stewart / Ashley Tanger1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLiat Ciardi / Beth Benton vs Dorothy Lewis / Kristine Werner2-6, 0-6
2025-01-25vs PRC Spirited WarriorsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandy Hutchins / Juliet Walsh vs Julie Porrazzo / Michelle McManigal2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSonia Bekian / Lisa Iezza vs Annie Schwartz / Barbara Connelly2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Sandy Hutchins
published
3.74
Diane Merade
published 4
3.58
Jennifer Wishengrad
published
3.53
Danielle Crawford
published 3.5
3.49
Lisa Iezza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.38
Angela Reynolds
published 3.5
3.36
Juliet Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Liat Ciardi
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.29
Mary Conversano
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Deborah Snyder
published 3.5
3.08
Tammy Snyder
published
3.04
Beth Benton
published 3.5
2.99
Marti Spencer
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.99
Houri Kazanjian
published
Kathy Ferrari
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Maggie Ham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liat Ciardi + Marti Spencer16854% games+10.6% vs expected
Lisa Iezza + Liat Ciardi18461% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Iezza + Marti Spencer91153% gamesnot enough data
Juliet Walsh + Mary Conversano314 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Hutchins + Juliet Walsh123 matchesnot enough data
Liat Ciardi + Mary Conversano033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandy Hutchins
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Diane Merade
9W–19L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Jennifer Wishengrad
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Danielle Crawford
25W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
4
Lisa Iezza
149W–108L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Angela Reynolds
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Juliet Walsh
51W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Liat Ciardi
204W–176L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Mary Conversano
67W–89L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Deborah Snyder
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
Tammy Snyder
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Beth Benton
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Marti Spencer
144W–198L career · 9 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Houri Kazanjian
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
Kathy Ferrari
57W–65L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Maggie Ham
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.