Teams

OLYMPIC 18AM5.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 5.0

13 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-07vs HARBOR PT 18AM5.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Hoeveler / Daniel Arnold vs Matthew Holt / Jeff Urban6-1, 6-2
2025-05-04vs HARBOR PT 18AM5.0AWon 21
L#1 DoublesIlya Gendelman / Daniel Arnold vs Jas Hodzic / Ryan Sablan5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPaul Giraud vs Jeff Greenwald6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaniel Landa / William Lyon vs Marc Lamonica / Jakub Pietrowski5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-26vs PIONEER PK 18AM5.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Brandt / Jas Hodzic vs John Hackbert / Ryan Smith6-2, 6-2
2025-04-13vs PIONEER PK 18AM5.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Brandt / Ryan Sablan vs Ryan Smith / Adam Mernit6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
4.91
Daniel Landa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.89
Arjith Jayaraman
published 5
4.85
Paul Giraud
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.84
Lance Ngo
published
4.79
David Orces
published 5
4.77
Philip Law
published
Daniel Arnold
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Daniel Brandt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.69
Oliver Kendall
published
4.52
Jesse Levitin
published
4.06
Patrick Dwyer
published
3.85
William Leonard
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alexander Brenner
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
4.93
5
Daniel Landa
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.91
5
Arjith Jayaraman
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.89
Paul Giraud
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
4.85
Lance Ngo
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
4.84
5
David Orces
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.79
Philip Law
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.77
5
Daniel Arnold
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Daniel Brandt
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Oliver Kendall
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
4.69
Jesse Levitin
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.52
Patrick Dwyer
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
4.06
William Leonard
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%0%
3.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.