Teams

SFV-Slice of Life

SFV-SoCal Doubles-18 & Over · SFV - Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-12vs SFV-Chicks with SticksLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelissa Jansson / Lauren Soll vs Lina Gomez / TANIA JANICEK5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2021-12-11vs SFV-Chicks with SticksLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Jansson / Vanessa Rodriguez vs Jacque Clendennen / Cecilia Greenway2-6, 0-6
2021-11-06vs SFV-Love HurtsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Jansson / Lauren Soll vs Tasha Gailys / Patricia Fernandez0-6
2021-10-16vs SFV-RacketeersWon 10
W#3 DoublesLauren Soll / Melissa Jansson vs Liyan Wang / Lana Mril6-1, 6-2
2021-10-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGloria Cardoza / Melissa Jansson vs Sarah Scott / Sylvia Yaafe2-6, 4-6
2021-10-02vs SFV-Love HurtsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Jansson / Vanessa Rodriguez vs Tasha Gailys / Patricia Fernandez6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2021-09-11vs SFV-RacketeersWon 10
W#3 DoublesTeri Gustafson / Melissa Jansson vs Ivonne Mendez / Zenaida Siojo6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Tamra Loeb
published
3.72
Teri Gustafson
published 4
Holly Culhane
published 3.5
3.10
Keiko Kato Verrier
published
3.06
Janine Baker
published
2.86
Amy Randles
published 3
2.85
Hanan Asfoury
published 3
2.84
Melissa Jansson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.83
Larissa Kazantsev
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Gloria Cardoza
published 3
2.52
Tes MacAraya
published
Coco Inamori
published
Serena Gittisarn
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tamra Loeb
13W–9L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Teri Gustafson
84W–67L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Holly Culhane
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Keiko Kato Verrier
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
Janine Baker
10W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Amy Randles
8W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Hanan Asfoury
11W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Melissa Jansson
45W–36L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
2.84
Larissa Kazantsev
74W–65L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Gloria Cardoza
7W–8L career · no lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
2.58
Tes MacAraya
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
2.52
Coco Inamori
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Serena Gittisarn
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.