Teams

CC: Herbert/Charles

2025 RI Adult 55 & Over Men · 6.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-07vs RP: LevesqueWon 30
W#1 DoublesTerence Charles / Aj Rockwell vs Larry Berman / Denis Fortier6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDon Swanson / Mark Hengen vs Scott Martin / Robert Ringman6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRaoul Dexters / Paul Krause vs Gerald Levesque / Jim Leavitt7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesTerence Charles / Peter Shinkle vs Steve Dakin / Dennis Callahan6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDon Swanson / Paul Krause vs Kenneth Savatdy / Jon Lieb7-5, 4-6, 2-1
W#3 DoublesRaoul Dexters / Erik Clark vs Chip Speicher / Sam Dalou6-2, 6-2
2025-07-20vs BRY: Joan SteereWon 21
L#1 DoublesAj Rockwell / Terence Charles vs Chris Caliri / John Doe4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRaoul Dexters / Craig van Dongen vs Scott Racine / Mike Del Vecchio6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMark Hengen / Paul Krause vs William Losiewicz / Richard Accetta6-3, 7-6
2025-07-14vs RP: Arthritis Aces/DonnellyWon 21
W#1 DoublesCraig van Dongen / Peter Shinkle vs Vladimir Akopian / Richard Mable6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRaoul Dexters / Erik Clark vs Chris Gilgun / Jon Mayer6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDon Swanson / Terence Charles vs Michael Ruo / Byron Kinniburgh6-2, 5-7, 2-4
2025-06-29vs BRY: Joan SteereLost 03
L#1 DoublesTerence Charles / Craig van Dongen vs Richard Graumann / Jason Burke6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesErik Clark / Timothy Herbert vs Chris Caliri / Bruce Kolovson5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMark Hengen / Paul Krause vs Scott Racine / Mike Del Vecchio2-6, 3-6
2025-06-26vs RP: Arthritis Aces/DonnellyWon 30
W#1 DoublesPeter Shinkle / Paul Krause vs Erik Hobbs / Charles Belshe6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTimothy Herbert / Erik Clark vs Christopher Donnelly / Ramesh Murthy5-7, 6-4, 2-1
W#3 DoublesAj Rockwell / Richard Noto vs Chris Gilgun / Harvey Alberg6-3, 6-2
2025-05-29vs RP: LevesqueWon 21
L#1 DoublesRaoul Dexters / Timothy Herbert vs Larry Berman / Denis Fortier3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAj Rockwell / Mark Hengen vs Robert Ringman / Scott Martin6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPeter Shinkle / Erik Clark vs Jack Coffey / Gerald Levesque6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesTerence Charles / Aj Rockwell vs Michael Robinson / Robert Iaconis6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTimothy Herbert / Raoul Dexters vs Dennis Callahan / Steve Dakin6-0, 2-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDon Swanson / Richard Noto vs Chip Speicher / William Conroy3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CC: Herbert/Charles0817716186
2BRY: Joan Steere0815921215
3FC: Endzone BrewersTravers/Speicher08131126222
4RP: Arthritis Aces/Donnelly08101434260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Terence Charles
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.11
Peter Shinkle
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Aj Rockwell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.07
Timothy Herbert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Craig van Dongen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Don Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Erik Clark
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Mark Hengen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Paul Krause
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Raoul Dexters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Noto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Herbert + Terence Charles6554% games+5.4% vs expected
Craig van Dongen + Terence Charles2349% gamesnot enough data
Aj Rockwell + Terence Charles2347% gamesnot enough data
Peter Shinkle + Terence Charles213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terence Charles
83W–88L career · 6 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Peter Shinkle
10W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Aj Rockwell
4W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Timothy Herbert
72W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.07
3
Craig van Dongen
5W–3L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Don Swanson
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Erik Clark
8W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Hengen
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Krause
20W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raoul Dexters
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Noto
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.