Teams

Corpus-Tennis Twisters

2025 18 & Over Little State · Ladies 3.0 Flight

15 players · average NTRP 3.07 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-16vs San Antonio-Dominion DollsLost 05
L#1 DoublesLeanna Saenz / Lucero Escutia vs Monica Esparza / Sarah Scoggin2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Gleinser vs Satchie Seidlits1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeatrice Villarreal / Rosita Saenz vs Carmen Ahmed / Jeanne Philippus1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKayla Havelka vs Heather Wilkinson0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Premchan / Hana Svejdova vs Karla Guerra / Blanca Nelly Rosales2-6, 1-6
2025-08-15vs Brownsville-RGV DynastyWon 32
L#1 DoublesCindy Premchan / Rosario Martinez vs Giselle Curto / Lis Garcia1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBeki Hall vs Atilana Nunez7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLucero Escutia / Amanda Pruett vs Maria Guerrero / Laura Perez- Reyes6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSima Nasr vs ERICKA REYES DIAZ6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAurora Robles / Brenda Escutia Woods vs Delia Molina / Silvia Butanda6-1, 6-3
2025-08-15vs Beaumont-RacquettesWon 50
W#1 DoublesLucero Escutia / Leanna Saenz vs Victoria Smith / Sydney Sovine6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAbcde Ceballos vs Stacie Boyd3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmanda Pruett / Cindy Premchan vs Kristin Stumbo / Daphne Bell7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesBeki Hall vs Lori Moore6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrenda Escutia Woods / Sima Nasr vs Pam Whittington / Jodi Love6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 3.0 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Lucero Escutia
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.05
Leanna Saenz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Abcde Ceballos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Sima Nasr
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Beki Hall
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.91
Brenda Escutia Woods
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Amanda Pruett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Cindy Premchan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Sarah Gleinser
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Rosario Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Hana Svejdova
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Beatrice Villarreal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Rosita Saenz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Aurora Robles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Kayla Havelka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lucero Escutia + Leanna Saenz14260% games+9.7% vs expected
Sarah Gleinser + Leanna Saenz4154% games+5.2% vs expected
Hana Svejdova + Brenda Escutia Woods4157% games−0.8% vs expected
Beatrice Villarreal + Brenda Escutia Woods5750% games−11.3% vs expected
Rosita Saenz + Cindy Premchan134 matchesnot enough data
Sima Nasr + Brenda Escutia Woods224 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Premchan + Brenda Escutia Woods404 matchesnot enough data
Aurora Robles + Kayla Havelka213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucero Escutia
43W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Leanna Saenz
39W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
3.5
Abcde Ceballos
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Sima Nasr
31W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Beki Hall
34W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Brenda Escutia Woods
33W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Amanda Pruett
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
Cindy Premchan
38W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Sarah Gleinser
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
2.85
Rosario Martinez
19W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Hana Svejdova
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Beatrice Villarreal
24W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Rosita Saenz
13W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Aurora Robles
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.65
Kayla Havelka
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.