Teams

4SCWB-MIDDLEBROOKS w tri-level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 SEM

2022 SEM TRI-LEVEL - August · WOMEN TRI LEVEL 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 SEM D2

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesBeth Street / Karen Weiss vs Sara Kenez / Sandra Martinez Avalos0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKarla Middlebrooks / Stephane Lubin vs Erin Livedoti / Qing Li2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanet Muir / Rebecca Sammut vs Lina E Bata / ELISA CARRARO2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesNozomi Craft / Karla Middlebrooks vs Ehren Dirksen / Marci Walker0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Flannery / Karren Yurgalite vs Lori Ferris / Elizabeth Skochelak1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Lovy / Rebecca Sammut vs Laura Seewald / Janet Johnston2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKarla Middlebrooks / Beth Street vs Jane Coffey / Jean Steppe0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKarren Yurgalite / Rebecca Sammut vs Carolynn Hayman / Lee Wu2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Muir / Angela Hogan vs Rebecca Washington / Marjorie Sarbaugh-Thompson0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesSharbari Joshi / Karla Middlebrooks vs Jeanie Dodge / Pamela Cliff2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesFaith Gaudaen / Diana Kohler vs Julie Wiernik / Janet Sommerfeld3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Muir / Rebecca Sammut vs Donna Ryan / Yue Guo3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#1 DoublesNozomi Craft / Beth Street vs Karen Hale / Lisa Hutton6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKarla Middlebrooks / Rebecca Sammut vs Michelle Famurewa / Anne Steinhauer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYVONNE GOGUEN / Jennifer Lovy vs Annemarie Dolan / Suparna Malhotra3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesNozomi Craft / Sharbari Joshi vs Kelly Coe / Nicole Hughes4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Flannery / Diana Kohler vs Qing Li / Juliette Wareham2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesYVONNE GOGUEN / Rebecca Sammut vs Agnieszka Palarz / Ana Rotar1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesKarla Middlebrooks / Sharbari Joshi vs Hanna Song / Ehren Dirksen0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Kohler / Jennifer Ostroff vs Carrie Bake-Wong / Natascha Barney3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Lovy / Angela Hogan vs Jennifer Bae / Charlene Dusack1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · WOMEN TRI LEVEL 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 SEM D2
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
16WESS-LI women tri-level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 SEM7119514153
23TRAVIS-SKOCHELAK womentri-level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 SEM6217716161
31LIB-HAESSLER women tri-level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 SEM5315921166
42CHIP-COOPER women tri-level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 SEM44101433244
55HV-REECE women tri-level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 SEM26101431212
64SCWB-MIDDLEBROOKS w tri-level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 SEM0812347278

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Nozomi Craft
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Beth Street
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Diana Kohler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Sharbari Joshi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Rebecca Sammut
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Stephane Lubin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Faith Gaudaen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Karla Middlebrooks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.37
Beth Flannery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Angela Hogan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jennifer Lovy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Karen Weiss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Karren Yurgalite
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
YVONNE GOGUEN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Faith Gaudaen + Diana Kohler3450% games+4.2% vs expected
Karla Middlebrooks + Jennifer Lovy3257% gamesnot enough data
Karla Middlebrooks + Stephane Lubin224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Lovy + Rebecca Sammut224 matchesnot enough data
Nozomi Craft + Beth Street123 matchesnot enough data
Karren Yurgalite + Beth Flannery123 matchesnot enough data
Karla Middlebrooks + Sharbari Joshi033 matchesnot enough data
Karla Middlebrooks + Beth Street123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nozomi Craft
35W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Beth Street
102W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Diana Kohler
21W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Sharbari Joshi
17W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Rebecca Sammut
25W–31L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Stephane Lubin
56W–107L career · 1 line in 2022
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Faith Gaudaen
55W–103L career · 1 line in 2022
43%57%<1%
2.52
3
Karla Middlebrooks
52W–80L career · 6 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Beth Flannery
50W–119L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
2.37
2.5
Angela Hogan
2W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Jennifer Lovy
23W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Weiss
24W–40L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Karren Yurgalite
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
YVONNE GOGUEN
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.