Teams

Sc.Chalkley18C

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-30vs De.Farmer18C5.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGregg Newton / Stephen Dahlem vs Carl Anthony / Daniel Alejos0-6, 4-6
2025-09-16vs Br.Buckingham18CWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Chalkley / Matt Cantando vs Jared Dix / Amanuel Haile6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarcos Castro / Stephen Dahlem vs Scott Thurston / Brian Buckingham7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJames Oliver / Harrison Gaskins vs BILLY WILLIAMS / Kevin Buckingham6-4, 7-5
2025-09-02vs Ma.Morriston18CLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Lalor / Matt Cantando vs Ben Bergmann / Ralph Sun6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarcos Castro / John Esham vs Christopher Leonard / Adrian Williams5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Mobley / Stephen Dahlem vs Vijayanand Periannan / Chidi Madu0-6, 2-6
2025-08-26vs De.Farmer18C5.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesMatt Cantando / Michael Lalor vs Michael Benecky / Jason Nance6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMarcos Castro / John Esham vs Chauncey Hatcher / William Murphy5-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Michael Lalor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Marcos Castro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Alex Eilhauer
published 3
2.56
Scott Chalkley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew Lloyd
published 2.5
2.00
Patrick Mobley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gregg Newton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Harrison Gaskins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Esham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Matt Cantando
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephen Dahlem
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Lalor
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Marcos Castro
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Alex Eilhauer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
Scott Chalkley
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Andrew Lloyd
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Mobley
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.00
Gregg Newton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Harrison Gaskins
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
John Esham
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Cantando
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Dahlem
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.