Teams

WEY:Weymouth:Leveille/Thibeault

2022 EMA Tri Level Fall 2022 · 4.0W

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-04vs WOB:Woburn:MaguireLost 01
L#1 DoublesNicole Dias / Anne Wilks vs Brittani Hetyei / Allison Vizgaitis5-7, 3-6
2022-11-06vs WAC:Waltham:PaytonWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Wilks / Kim Ton vs Saru Wade / Esra Gurel6-4, 6-4
2022-10-30vs WOB:Woburn:MaguireWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Thibeault / Anne Wilks vs Margot Bloom / Allison Vizgaitis7-6, 3-2
2022-10-30vs WAC:Waltham:PaytonWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Dias / Kim Ton vs Robin Sjostrom / Sarah Samano6-1, 6-2
2022-09-25vs WAC:Waltham:PaytonWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Dias / Kristen Thibeault vs Robin Sjostrom / Marina Momot3-6, 6-5, 1-0
2022-09-18vs WOB:Woburn:MaguireWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Dias / Kristen Thibeault vs Margot Bloom / Allison Vizgaitis7-5, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MAC:OverServed:Bradley/Koch9090480
2WEY:Weymouth:Leveille/Thibeault5151351
3NEW:Newburyport:Finneral/Conroy5353874
4WIL:Willows:Pritchard5454875
5SFT:Spark F&T Green:Doherty/Farabaugh4444973
6WOB:Woburn:Maguire3333650
7SFT:Spark F&T Blue:Swank373715102
8WAC:Waltham:Payton15151065
9WIL:Willows:Minuti191919112

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Anne Wilks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Elizabeth Lamberti
published 4.5
3.97
Kristen Thibeault
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Kirsten DeSalvo
published
3.72
Nicole Dias
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Ton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Wilks + Kirsten DeSalvo5170% games+10.9% vs expected
Nicole Dias + Kristen Thibeault314 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Dias + Anne Wilks314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Wilks
42W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Elizabeth Lamberti
41W–35L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08
Kristen Thibeault
38W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
Kirsten DeSalvo
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Nicole Dias
81W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Kim Ton
8W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.