← Teams

SAC-Marsh

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Michael Leake
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
—
Yadong Li
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Rajan Madhusudan
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Jeff Legassick
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
—
Tim Fernstrom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Peter Brandenburger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 0
—
Todd Spear
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results9 ties
2020-02-29Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesStephen Marsh / Peter Brandenburger vs Wiley Zhao / Tony Kalil6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRajan Madhusudan / Sharad Tripathi vs Nick Hooker / Robert Glenn6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichael Leake vs Dan Tracy6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTodd Spear / Michael Sullivan vs Chris Cremer / David Bender6-2, 6-0
2020-02-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJeff Legassick / Yuehai Liang vs John Jay / Larry Hermida6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesPeter Brandenburger vs Zac Carlson6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichael Sullivan / Rajan Madhusudan vs Daniel Turner / Seth Wagner6-2, 7-5
2020-02-15Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesRajan Madhusudan / Kok Waii Wong vs John Hapke / Stanley Hanks6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Leake / Yuehai Liang vs Jon Peters / Charles Hahn6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJeff Legassick vs Augustin Belindean6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPeter Brandenburger / Sharad Tripathi vs Kimbal Logan / David Smiley6-4, 6-2
2020-02-08Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesPeter Brandenburger / Rajan Madhusudan vs Edward Fu / NANDA SIDDAIAH6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeff Legassick / Michael Sullivan vs James Takahashi / Masafumi Inoue6-1, 6-4
2020-01-17Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesDavid Aman / Peter Brandenburger vs Shane Kim / Michael Lee6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Leake / Jeff Legassick vs Jeremy Fields / MICHAEL DOHERTY6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesYadong Li vs Kent Wall6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRajan Madhusudan / Sharad Tripathi vs Robert Kelly / Ian Miller1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2020-01-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRajan Madhusudan / Sharad Tripathi vs Charles Haugh / Wes Haas6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMichael Leake vs Anthony Lopez6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTim Fernstrom / Yuehai Liang vs Mark Bernazzani / Sebastian Llados Vila4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2020-01-04Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesDavid Aman / Tim Fernstrom vs John Wallin / JT Smith6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Leake / Michael Sullivan vs Gary Doyle / Dean Gaylor4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 SinglesPeter Brandenburger vs George Riley2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYuehai Liang / Rajan Madhusudan vs Daniel Gorecki / Purna Gadde6-4, 6-1
2019-12-14Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRajan Madhusudan / Cassia Carpio vs Karen Walker / Rich Johnson6-1, 6-3
2019-12-13Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesRajan Madhusudan / Cassia Carpio vs Chris Blevins / Jinquan Wu6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Michael Leake
16W–40L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Yadong Li
21W–19L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Rajan Madhusudan
94W–79L career
13%87%0%
3.09
3
Jeff Legassick
31W–47L career
not enough data
—
3
Tim Fernstrom
20W–31L career
not enough data
—
0
Peter Brandenburger
21W–20L career
not enough data
—
0
Todd Spear
23W–21L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.