Teams

OC Lifetime SC - Merwin

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 4.0W

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesChristine Reenders / Lynn Moore vs Denise Banks / Lynn Kamada6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesUrsula Cassinelli vs Sahar Kamali2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSonia Bishop / Karen Berman vs Sue Shin / Diane Dupuy6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDarlene Redburn / Barbara Springer vs Holly Wyler / Yoko Bannai2-6, 6-7
2025-01-31vs OC DHTC - Dara - 1030Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSonia Bishop / Janice Trojan vs Stacy Ison / Sara Wiens3-6, 5-7
2025-01-17vs OC Irvine Great Park - Susie R -10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTraci Streets / Janice Trojan vs Vera Garrard / Shauna Blattner6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Christine Reenders
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Annette Drake
published 4
Amy Schetman
published 4
3.70
Patty Podley
published
3.63
Janice Trojan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Sonia Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Bev Merwin
published 3.5
3.50
Ursula Cassinelli
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.48
JILL ESLICK
published 3.5
3.39
Samantha Ackad
published
3.37
Barbara Springer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Darlene Redburn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Renate Snow-Poe
published
Traci Streets
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Reenders
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%27%73%
4.08
4
Annette Drake
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Amy Schetman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patty Podley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Janice Trojan
27W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Sonia Bishop
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Bev Merwin
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.50
Ursula Cassinelli
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
JILL ESLICK
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.48
Samantha Ackad
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Barbara Springer
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Darlene Redburn
2W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Renate Snow-Poe
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Traci Streets
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.