Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Wright

2022 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 2.5W

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-17Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesJenna Pike / Madalyn Nelson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-12-10vs Liberty Park Tennis-Soffe/LoveWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesCandace Haroldsen / Kristin Midyett vs Madi Kerr / Maddy Garrett5-7, 4-3, 1-0
2022-12-03vs Liberty Park Tennis-Olson/MasseyLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesKristin Midyett / Morgan Hansen vs Teresa Jackson / Holly Christensen4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 Female DoublesPat Williams / Jenna Pike vs Madison Milligan / Hailey Jensen7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-11-12vs Liberty Park Tennis-El FuegoLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesMiranda Tilley / Kristin Midyett vs Alicia Miller / Shelly Kaihatu2-6, 1-6
2022-11-05vs Sports Mall-Team FunLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesDiana Vogel / Jenna Pike vs Jamie Crews / Lauren Griswold0-6, 0-6
L#3 Female DoublesMiranda Tilley / Kelly Singer vs Olivia Moreton / Stephanie Morris3-6, 1-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
2.93
Miranda Tilley
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Kelly Singer
published
2.66
Diana Vogel
published 3
2.63
Ashley Wright
published 3
2.42
Pat Williams
published
2.35
Jenna Pike
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.08
Kristin Midyett
usually #2 Female Doubles 33%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Madalyn Nelson
published
Michaela Riding
published
Morgan Hansen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candace Haroldsen + Kelly Singer1447% games+8.0% vs expected
Diana Vogel + Kelly Singer131154% games+5.5% vs expected
Kristin Midyett + Jenna Pike2541% games+2.9% vs expected
Kristin Midyett + Diana Vogel1736% games−7.3% vs expected
Candace Haroldsen + Diana Vogel1437% games−13.8% vs expected
Michaela Riding + Diana Vogel0533% gamesnot enough data
Michaela Riding + Candace Haroldsen044 matchesnot enough data
Candace Haroldsen + Kristin Midyett314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Candace Haroldsen
86W–59L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Miranda Tilley
35W–76L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
Kelly Singer
34W–50L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Diana Vogel
52W–77L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.66
3
Ashley Wright
53W–112L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.63
Pat Williams
20W–31L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.42
2.5
Jenna Pike
32W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Kristin Midyett
41W–130L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Madalyn Nelson
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michaela Riding
2W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Morgan Hansen
20W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.