Teams

B1 Raintree Massengill

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-08vs B5 Bon Air Babes MossWon 20
W#1 DoublesTruitt Allcott / Erin Lyons vs Aimee McCarthy / Lynette Villadelgado6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmy Boschen vs Theresa Keefe6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-05vs B8 MRTC Battery Park Hawley/GrayWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Boschen / Shannon Foster vs Ariel Trimiew / Joy Nyman6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErin Lyons / Elizabeth Updike vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-22vs B7 MAC Bouncers BatesWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Lyons / Peggy Bryan vs Mary Church / Jane Harrison2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmy Boschen vs Amy Williams6-1, 6-0
2021-05-16Split 11
W#2 DoublesAmy Boschen / Jean Cheek vs Danielle Brown / Ashley Waite6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesErin Lyons / Elizabeth Updike vs Julia Carr / Amy Pocklington3-6, 5-3
2021-05-15vs B6 Avalon GhitaWon 10
W#2 SinglesAmy Boschen vs Emily Mason4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-05-01vs B4 Woodlake LarocheLost 01
L#2 SinglesErin Lyons vs Lauren Bale4-6, 5-7
2021-04-17vs B2 Acac Blackburn/RocoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesShannon Foster / Erin Lyons vs Daphne Cole / Wythe Shockley5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Massengill / Amy Boschen vs Ashley Howle / Kellie Banton4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-04-10vs B7 MAC Bouncers BatesLost 01
L#2 DoublesMolly Smith / Amy Boschen vs Mary Church / Ruth Bates5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2021-04-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTruitt Allcott / Erin Lyons vs Doina Sava / Kim Johnson3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Shannon Foster
published
3.16
Deanne Ralston
published 3.5
2.89
Peggy Bryan
published
2.87
Amy Boschen
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.79
Truitt Allcott
published
2.77
Jean Cheek
published
2.74
Erin Lyons
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Bryan + Amy Boschen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Foster
15W–11L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Deanne Ralston
7W–8L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
Peggy Bryan
28W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Amy Boschen
154W–164L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.87
Truitt Allcott
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.79
Jean Cheek
27W–17L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Erin Lyons
87W–117L career · 7 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.