Teams

Meja

2026 Lubbock Adult League 18 & Over · 3.0 Ladies

12 players · average NTRP 2.92 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-18vs Copeland/NixonLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmily Jenkins / Katie Kamper vs Jordan DeBolt / Kathy Sim6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChamonix Mejia / Jill Simpson vs Noelle Flores / Becky Kerby2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnna Purdue / Reagan Jenkins vs Shawna Cone / Dawn Cox5-7, 6-7
2026-05-13vs BoggsLost 14
W#1 DoublesKatie Kamper / Emily Jenkins vs Leslie Morgan / Natasha Newman6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJacky Nghiem vs Kate Miller2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSara Parrott / Anna Purdue vs Kathy Eubanks / Jayme Pearson6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesChamonix Mejia vs Cody Boggs0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPaige Homen / Katie Crump vs Hampton Hays / Samantha Chitsey1-6, 1-6
2026-05-11vs PerrinLost 23
W#1 DoublesEmily Jenkins / Katie Kamper vs Emily Liner / Mariana Hatch6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesChamonix Mejia vs Dayna McCutchin2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAshlen Sturdivant / Katie Crump vs Kay Miller / Laura Seybert6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJill Simpson vs Ann-Marie Saleh2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Lent / Reagan Jenkins vs Sydney Farris / Jera Gentry6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-04vs McGuireWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Jenkins / Sara Parrott vs Malorie McBath / Toni Rentfro6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Lent / Anna Purdue vs Kondi Littlefield / Martina Novotna7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatie Crump / Paige Homen vs Kaycee Tabor / Keeli Hobratschk7-6, 6-0
2026-04-20vs BoggsLost 23
W#1 DoublesKatie Kamper / Emily Jenkins vs Jami Broussard / Natasha Newman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJacky Nghiem vs Lingxi Xu4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJill Simpson / Ashlen Sturdivant vs Leslie Morgan / Cody Boggs4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesChamonix Mejia vs Samantha Chitsey6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnna Purdue / Paige Homen vs Hampton Hays / Kathy Eubanks2-6, 1-6
2026-04-13vs Copeland/NixonLost 04
L#1 DoublesAshlen Sturdivant / Katie Kamper vs Allison Childress / Jordan DeBolt1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChamonix Mejia vs Kathy Sim3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJill Simpson / Sara Parrott vs Noelle Flores / Laura Henderson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnn Lent / Reagan Jenkins vs Holly Carter / Ashley Copeland2-6, 2-6
2026-04-06vs PerrinLost 23
L#1 DoublesAshlen Sturdivant / Chamonix Mejia vs Robin Perrin / Dayna McCutchin5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSara Parrott vs Clair Jones6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Jenkins / Katie Crump vs Emily Liner / Ginger McDowell7-6, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJill Simpson vs Kaci Griffin2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJacky Nghiem / Paige Homen vs Kay Miller / Sydney Farris2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-23vs McGuireWon 40
W#1 DoublesAshlen Sturdivant / Jill Simpson vs Jeri McGuire / Malorie McBath2-6, 3-1
W#2 DoublesKatie Kamper / Katie Crump vs Toni Rentfro / Kaycee Tabor6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJacky Nghiem vs Jorja Mcguire6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnn Lent / Anna Purdue vs Julie Williams / Kate Williams6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Ashlen Sturdivant
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.93
Jacky Nghiem
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.90
Chamonix Mejia
usually #2 Singles 55%, also #1 Singles 18% · published 3
2.89
Anna Purdue
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.87
Katie Crump
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.84
Sara Parrott
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Emily Jenkins
published 3
2.73
Jill Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
2.73
Katie Kamper
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.69
Ann Lent
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.66
Reagan Jenkins
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.39
Paige Homen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Parrott + Jill Simpson0527% gamesnot enough data
Ann Lent + Anna Purdue404 matchesnot enough data
Chamonix Mejia + Sara Parrott123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashlen Sturdivant
13W–20L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Jacky Nghiem
10W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Chamonix Mejia
9W–33L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Anna Purdue
9W–7L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Katie Crump
11W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
Sara Parrott
7W–19L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Emily Jenkins
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jill Simpson
2W–27L career · 11 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Katie Kamper
15W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
Ann Lent
8W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%7%93%
2.69
Reagan Jenkins
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%11%89%
2.66
Paige Homen
10W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.