Teams

MIS:Beta:Abate

2023 ECT Adult 18 & Over Men · 3.0 Men 1

9 players · average NTRP / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-01-15vs GF:Super Smash Brothers:KaplanWon 10
W#1 DoublesVictor Pereira / Jason Burke vs Mark Aron / Anthony Ferrara6-2, 6-2
2022-12-17vs GF:Super Smash Brothers:KaplanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVictor Pereira / Jason Burke vs Mark Aron / Anthony Ferrara6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPeter DeWitt / Timothy Jarrell vs Andrew Kaplan / Martin Tillier6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-12-10vs GF:Super Smash Brothers:KaplanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKyle Haifley / Thomas Kraft vs Donald Bernier / Andrew Kaplan6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesVictor Pereira vs Brendan Choisnet0-6, 2-6
2022-11-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Russo / Thomas Kraft vs Andrew Kaplan / Stephen Thomas6-2, 6-2
2022-10-22vs GF:Super Smash Brothers:KaplanWon 30
W#1 DoublesThomas Kraft / Thomas Baldwin vs Anthony Ferrara / Mark Aron6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBrian Russo vs Andrew Kaplan6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTimothy Jarrell / Peter DeWitt vs William Mainor / Mark Warner6-3, 6-0
2022-10-02vs GF:Super Smash Brothers:KaplanWon 30
W#1 DoublesThomas Kraft / Thomas Baldwin vs Andrew Kaplan / Johannes Zaaijer6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesVictor Pereira vs Stephen Thomas6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTimothy Jarrell / Kyle Haifley vs Martin Tillier / Mark Warner6-2, 6-3
2022-09-17vs GF:Super Smash Brothers:KaplanWon 21
W#1 DoublesThomas Baldwin / Thomas Kraft vs Mark Aron / Stephen Thomas6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesVictor Pereira vs Brendan Choisnet3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKyle Haifley / Brian Russo vs Anthony Ferrara / Andrew Kaplan6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MIS:Beta:Abate0615818153

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Kyle Haifley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Anthony Barri
published
Brian Russo
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jason Burke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peter DeWitt
published
Thomas Baldwin
published
Thomas Kraft
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Timothy Jarrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Victor Pereira
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyle Haifley
21W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
Anthony Barri
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Brian Russo
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Burke
36W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter DeWitt
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Baldwin
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Kraft
21W–25L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Timothy Jarrell
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Victor Pereira
11W–31L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.