Teams

Marion - FK/Mecca

2021 Marion Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNatalie Petsche / Penny Terry vs Barbara Obenour Scully / Kimberly Brewer4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-07-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesCarol Mecca / Penny Terry vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-17vs FK - SimpsonWon 20
W#2 DoublesEllen Perrone / Shaana Slaughter vs Barbara Obenour Scully / Melissa Quigley6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPenny Terry / Natalie Petsche vs Carmen Clements / Wanda Simpson6-4, 6-2
2021-07-14vs FK - SimpsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesEllen Perrone / Natalie Petsche vs Nneka Nwakoby / Andrea Harden2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-26vs FK - SimpsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesEllen Perrone / Shaana Slaughter vs Sharon Christie Ybanez / Natalie Slatton2-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Caroline Murray
published 4
3.74
Dana Pine
published 4
3.61
Susan Atwell
published
3.48
Dina Sapienza
published 4
3.45
Carol Mecca
published 3.5
3.42
Penny Terry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Elise Atwell
published 3.5
Beth Eiland
published 3.5
Carmen Rosario
published 3.5
Cheryl Prusak
published 3.5
3.13
Ellen Perrone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Michelle Smith
published
Natalie Petsche
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Perrone + Penny Terry3264% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caroline Murray
13W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Dana Pine
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Susan Atwell
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Carol Mecca
7W–0L career · no lines in 2021
<1%65%35%
3.45
Penny Terry
52W–40L career · 3 lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Elise Atwell
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Beth Eiland
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Carmen Rosario
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Cheryl Prusak
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Ellen Perrone
88W–117L career · 3 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
Michelle Smith
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Natalie Petsche
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.