← Teams

SAC-Sun/Boyce

2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.7 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Janna McDougall
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
—
Kaelin Teo
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.64
Martin von Haartman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Paritosh Saxena
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Jian Xu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Shawn Boyce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Lyann Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Mubashir Cheema
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.19
Jill Boyce
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.09
Rajan Madhusudan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-11-13Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMartin von Haartman / Kaelin Teo vs Ryan Manwiller / Kimberly Parks6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMubashir Cheema / Jian Xu vs Ariana White / Nate Larsen6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJanna McDougall / Paritosh Saxena vs Nina Hanson / Scott Reis6-3, 6-2
2022-11-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesShawn Boyce / Lyann Nguyen vs Stefan Youngs / Karen Barks2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMartin von Haartman / Kaelin Teo vs Son Huynh / Inna Vlad6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJanna McDougall / Paritosh Saxena vs Brian Hughes / Carolyn Graeper6-4, 6-3
2022-10-23Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesShawn Boyce / Jian Xu vs Bruce Robertson / Andrea Robertson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHelen Chen / Mubashir Cheema vs Morgan Towle / Paul Laurent6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJill Boyce / Dao Her vs Colleen Walker / Jeff Streich6-0, 6-0
2022-10-22Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesHelen Chen / Mubashir Cheema vs Debbie Frankel / Christopher Robbins7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesShawn Boyce / Lyann Nguyen vs Carla Scott / Jason Fitzgerald6-0, 6-1
2022-10-09Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesJian Xu / Sheldon Sun vs Jonathan Hong / Celene Robert4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHelen Chen / Rajan Madhusudan vs Kalynn Belden / Wiley Zhao6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJill Boyce / Dao Her vs Jin Velasco / Leo Edmunson6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-10-08Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesShawn Boyce / Jian Xu vs Sebastian Llados Vila / Lyudmila Leissler6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDao Her / Jill Boyce vs Rachel Novak / Seth Wagner6-2, 6-1
2022-10-01Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesKaelin Teo / Martin von Haartman vs Rebe Colasurdo / Brad Wolverton6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRajan Madhusudan / Lyann Nguyen vs Melanie Morris / Robert Meyer6-0, 6-4
2022-09-24Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesShawn Boyce / Lyann Nguyen vs Matt Savage / Heather Watkins6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMubashir Cheema / Helen Chen vs Mark Bernazzani / Karen Pickering4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Boyce / Paritosh Saxena vs Greg Mikol / Kyra John7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Janna McDougall
58W–34L career
not enough data
—
4
Kaelin Teo
55W–38L career
not enough data
—
4
Martin von Haartman
140W–50L career
7%93%0%
3.64
4
Paritosh Saxena
35W–31L career
10%90%0%
3.64
3.5
Jian Xu
138W–56L career
0%88%12%
3.47
3.5
Shawn Boyce
170W–125L career
0%99%0%
3.27
3.5
Lyann Nguyen
59W–44L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Mubashir Cheema
71W–74L career
3%97%0%
3.21
3.5
Jill Boyce
148W–90L career
3%97%0%
3.19
3.5
Rajan Madhusudan
94W–79L career
13%87%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.