Teams

GEPTA/Ferris/18&over/3.0M

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesGustavo Marquez Gandara / Mauricio Segura vs James Lambeth / Sergio Chavez6-3, 6-1
2026-05-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesMauricio Segura / Gustavo Marquez Gandara vs Collins Preston / Dennis Rodriguez6-1, 6-2
2026-05-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGustavo Marquez Gandara / Mauricio Segura vs Edgar Garcia Larquier / Esteban Sandoval7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlejandro Borunda / Gustavo Marquez Gandara vs Edgar Borrego / Diego Ramirez6-4, 6-2
2026-04-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesGustavo Marquez Gandara / Mauricio Segura vs Findlay Gabriel Yepo / John O'Leary6-1, 7-6
2026-04-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristian Charles / Gustavo Marquez Gandara vs Ruben Ramirez / Dennis Rodriguez6-2, 7-6
2026-03-31Won 10
W#1 DoublesMauricio Segura / Gustavo Marquez Gandara vs Ventura Quinones / Julio Recio6-2, 6-3
2026-03-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesGustavo Marquez Gandara / Mauricio Segura vs Rafael Gabilondo / Genaro Roldan6-3, 7-6
2026-03-10vs GEPTA/18&over/3.0M/Niland/EPCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesMauricio Segura / Gustavo Marquez Gandara vs Cliff Richardson / Sebastian Nunez6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Ferris/18&over/3.0M102451534426
2GEPTA/18&over/3.0M/Contreras/EPTC#148253575562
3GEPTA/18&over/3.0M/Ramirez/CCC210164498656

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Bill Ruddock
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.95
Alejandro Borunda
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.92
Christian Charles
usually #1 Doubles 32%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published 3
2.87
Andres Najera
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3
Gustavo Marquez Gandara
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published
Ivan Trachter
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
JOSE MENDEZ
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
James McCleland
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Julio Terrazas
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Manouchehr Refaeian
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mauricio Segura
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Michael Ferris
published
Miguel Ramos Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Pierre Lacasse-Jobin
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Ralph Rasura
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roger Molina
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Singles 21% · published
Sergio E Chavez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JOSE MENDEZ + Miguel Ramos Gonzalez101249% gamesnot enough data
Sergio E Chavez + Pierre Lacasse-Jobin9261% gamesnot enough data
Miguel Ramos Gonzalez + Bill Ruddock6455% gamesnot enough data
JOSE MENDEZ + Bill Ruddock5454% gamesnot enough data
Bill Ruddock + Pierre Lacasse-Jobin5260% gamesnot enough data
Gustavo Marquez Gandara + Mauricio Segura6164% gamesnot enough data
Ralph Rasura + Miguel Ramos Gonzalez3255% gamesnot enough data
Sergio E Chavez + Bill Ruddock404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bill Ruddock
73W–81L career · 35 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Alejandro Borunda
27W–20L career · 21 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Christian Charles
29W–17L career · 22 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Andres Najera
13W–5L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Gustavo Marquez Gandara
13W–5L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ivan Trachter
24W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
JOSE MENDEZ
33W–43L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
James McCleland
69W–65L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julio Terrazas
47W–22L career · 25 lines in 2026
not enough data
Manouchehr Refaeian
112W–93L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mauricio Segura
15W–9L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Ferris
7W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Miguel Ramos Gonzalez
33W–47L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pierre Lacasse-Jobin
18W–13L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ralph Rasura
50W–68L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roger Molina
9W–5L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sergio E Chavez
37W–16L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.