Teams

STC KULAK

2026 FW USTA Adult Fall Ladies · Friday 3.5 ladies

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-28vs RTC CAULEYWon 31
W#1 DoublesRachel Ricketts / Carrie Kulak vs Kelly Wilson / Linda Stumpff6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJamie Handy vs Diana Ahmad6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Langley / Amber Whites vs Melinda Whitlock / Irene Luna6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesHolly Finucan / Tracy Secord vs Elizabeth Varghese / Bernestine Knight6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-17vs ALL BENNETT/GUIROLALost 04
L#1 DoublesMary Dean / Samah Farousi vs Carley Cagle / Courtney Lewis3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Partington vs Caroline Crawford7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCecily Burk / Suzanne Rogachuk vs Charlotte Norris / Jennifer Palko6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmber Whites / Michelle Thomas vs Katherine Margeson / Taylor Green4-6, 4-6
2025-10-10vs BIR ROGERSLost 13
L#1 DoublesCecily Burk / Mary Dean vs Bree Mcalister / Yelena Johnson5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJamie Handy vs Gina Godsey7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Rogachuk / Katie Partington vs Melanie Bartlett / Tiffany Rogers1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Finucan / Stephanie Abiodun vs Susan Covington / Julie Theilken4-6, 1-6
2025-10-03vs SO LEONWon 31
W#1 DoublesSamah Farousi / Michelle Langley vs Mikal Powers / Caitlin McCabe6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStephanie Abiodun vs Delaney Masterson0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Thomas / Jamie Handy vs Jessica Leon / Sarah Kate Jones6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRachel Ricketts / Carrie Kulak vs Kristy Leedy / Heather Martin6-1, 6-3
2025-09-26vs WAG SCHULTZ/RAMEYLost 13
L#1 DoublesCecily Burk / Rachel Ricketts vs Vicki Rose / Kiz Costin0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCarrie Kulak vs Lori Bennett0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Partington / Michelle Thomas vs Ashley Hickey / Shari Jones2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHolly Finucan / Suzanne Rogachuk vs Elizabeth Haas / April Schultz6-7, 4-6
2025-09-19vs CCC MILLERLost 13
L#1 DoublesMary Dean / Jamie Handy vs Emily Miller / Stacy Hamilton7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKatie Partington vs Meggan Jamison7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSamah Farousi / Michelle Langley vs Hillary Bintliff / Gloria Penny1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAmber Whites / Holly Finucan vs Mindy Hegi / Courtney Heydenburk0-6, 1-6
2025-09-05vs CCC ROSSSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Rogachuk / Cecily Burk vs Mary Ellen Dickerson / Kelly Pumphrey3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJamie Handy vs Mary McKee3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie Kulak / Rachel Ricketts vs Meri Perryman / Shannon Barham6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Thomas / Stephanie Abiodun vs Sherri Ross / Jill Cassady6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday 3.5 ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Michelle Langley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Rachel Ricketts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Samah Farousi
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Jamie Handy
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Carrie Kulak
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Amber Whites
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Tracy Secord
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Katie Partington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.10
Suzanne Rogachuk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Cecily Burk
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.87
Stephanie Abiodun
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.58
Holly Finucan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samah Farousi + Michelle Langley5355% games+5.7% vs expected
Carrie Kulak + Rachel Ricketts5553% games+0.8% vs expected
Cecily Burk + Suzanne Rogachuk044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Langley
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Rachel Ricketts
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Samah Farousi
8W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Jamie Handy
10W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Carrie Kulak
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Amber Whites
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Tracy Secord
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
Katie Partington
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
Suzanne Rogachuk
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cecily Burk
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Stephanie Abiodun
16W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Holly Finucan
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.