Teams

Richardson/Beeson 18s Singles

2022 Piedmont Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Women 18 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-07-15vs Harlan - Singles 18s 4.0WLost 01
L#1 SinglesErin Richardson vs Heather Parr3-6, 4-6
2022-07-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesErin Richardson vs Emily Walsh2-6, 3-6
2022-06-30vs Schweitzer - Singles 18s 4.0WWon 10
W#2 SinglesErin Richardson vs Carrie McElvogue6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Elizabeth Gill
published 4.5
3.92
Marianna Bryce
published
3.81
Sara Nundkumar
published
3.67
Claire Parsons
published 4
3.56
Melissa Beeson
published
3.44
Erin Richardson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Angela Muller
published 3.5
3.11
Anita Allis
published 3.5
Morgan McKinley
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elizabeth Gill
23W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.30
Marianna Bryce
18W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
Sara Nundkumar
22W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Claire Parsons
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Melissa Beeson
13W–20L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Erin Richardson
92W–116L career · 3 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Angela Muller
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Anita Allis
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Morgan McKinley
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.