Teams

GREENBROOK RS 18MX6.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX6.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesErin Moran / John Aurelius vs Karen Bibel / Shiva Dixit6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHannes Magnusson / Verena Zacharias vs Christina Cordoza / Lou Salvador3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Moran / Beverly Guevara vs Jaclyn Rosete / Ryan Rosete0-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesVerena Zacharias / Corey Zelunka vs Ryan Rosete / Jaclyn Rosete6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHannes Magnusson / Diana Stauffer vs Emma Hughes / Kelly Lynch3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathlyn Powers / Joe Moss vs Elaine Marshall / Shiva Dixit1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Erin Moran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Rob Corder
published
2.84
Hannes Magnusson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Joe Moss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
2.73
Jeff Moran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Juan Garrahan
published
2.55
Daniel Lopez
published 3
2.53
Beverly Guevara
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Diana Stauffer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Mira Moss
published
Corey Zelunka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Aurelius
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Garrahan
published
Kathlyn Powers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Verena Zacharias
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Garrahan + Juan Garrahan1541% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erin Moran
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Rob Corder
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Hannes Magnusson
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
Joe Moss
1W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Christina Syriani
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Jeff Moran
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Juan Garrahan
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Daniel Lopez
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
3
Beverly Guevara
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.53
2.5
Diana Stauffer
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%48%52%
2.50
Mira Moss
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Corey Zelunka
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
John Aurelius
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Julie Garrahan
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathlyn Powers
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Verena Zacharias
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.