Teams

UNIVERSITY CLUB PA CM8.5A

2023 COMBO · Men 8.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Mark Dinh
published
4.30
Randy Becker
published
4.25
Piyush Lakhawat
published
4.04
Jason Matlof
published
4.04
Mitch Hu
published
3.90
Mike Jawetz
published
3.90
Tom Brehme
published
3.86
Mahi DeSilva
published
3.78
Nathan Walker
published
3.67
David Cao
published 4
3.65
Craig Jorasch
published 4
3.63
Dinraj Shetty
published 4
3.60
Steve Turnbull
published
Ramu Arunachalam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randy Becker + Jason Matlof404 matchesnot enough data
Tom Brehme + Jason Matlof134 matchesnot enough data
Steve Turnbull + Nathan Walker303 matchesnot enough data
Dinraj Shetty + David Cao303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Dinh
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
4.34
Randy Becker
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
4.30
Piyush Lakhawat
19W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
Jason Matlof
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.04
Mitch Hu
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
4.04
Mike Jawetz
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
Tom Brehme
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
3.90
Mahi DeSilva
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
Nathan Walker
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
4
David Cao
12W–18L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Craig Jorasch
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Dinraj Shetty
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.63
Steve Turnbull
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Ramu Arunachalam
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.