← Teams

MPRC-Morris/Wyngarden

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5+ Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.19 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Julie Bryan Maack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
—
Kelly Branson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Sarah Morris
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.97
Krissy Wyngarden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
—
Sandi Bittler
usually #1 Singles 20%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.59
Lynne Gaerisch
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.57
Marie Picard
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
—
Lisa Cohns
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2019-06-15Lost 0–5
L#1 DoublesSandi Bittler / Sarah Townley vs Deanna Lautenbach / Sue Gregoire6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSarah Morris vs Kristin Fudalla6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Anderson / Marie Picard vs Jill Sather / Tami Oglesby6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKrissy Wyngarden vs Tiare Farris6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Branson / Lisa Cohns vs Tonya Dirk / Sarah Lanigan7-5, 6-2
2019-06-08Lost 0–3
L#2 DoublesSheila Bunnell / Lisa Cohns vs Leslie Ballard / Monique Eldridge6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJulie Bryan Maack vs Bronwen Hager6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Branson / Nancy Osborne vs Honghui Liang / Sydney Taggart7-6, 6-2
2019-06-01Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesSarah Morris / Lynn McKelvey vs Amanda Solomon / Monika Dolega-kowalewski6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Cohns / Kelly Branson vs Shannon Fraser / Tara Heikila6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSandi Bittler vs Amy Foley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Rousseau / Krissy Wyngarden vs Andrea Cunningham / June Wu6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2019-05-11Lost 1–3
W#1 SinglesSarah Morris vs Kelcey Brown6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheila Bunnell / Lisa Cohns vs Donna Roisom / Lisa Lynch6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLynne Gaerisch vs Trish Vawter6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSandi Bittler / Kelly Branson vs Lisa Lyon / Tracy Bardell6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2019-05-05Won 2–1
W#2 DoublesMary Rousseau / Marie Picard vs Karen Sullivan / Anne McCroskey6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKrissy Wyngarden vs Jennifer Hill6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKelly Branson / Nancy Osborne vs Kim Hill / Bonnie Sidoff6-4, 6-2
2019-04-28Lost 1–3
L#1 SinglesLynne Gaerisch vs Nicole Mather6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSandi Bittler / Kelly Branson vs Shannon Dilorenzo / Jennifer Devoe6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSarah Morris vs Annie Duong6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Cohns / Marie Picard vs Mari Mitchelson / Lori Layne7-5, 7-5
2019-04-19Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesLynn McKelvey / Julie Bryan Maack vs Kristy Paratore / Cathy Valentine6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSandi Bittler vs Amy Pearson-Albano6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLynne Gaerisch vs Erica Ryan4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Morris / Krissy Wyngarden vs Kori Montpas / Nancy Garlock6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Julie Bryan Maack
15W–15L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Kelly Branson
16W–32L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Sarah Morris
85W–38L career
3%97%0%
4.13
4.5
Krissy Wyngarden
46W–30L career
21%79%0%
3.97
4
Sandi Bittler
34W–50L career
not enough data
—
4
Lynne Gaerisch
31W–28L career
21%79%0%
3.59
4
Marie Picard
128W–96L career
18%82%0%
3.57
3.5
Lisa Cohns
17W–25L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.