Teams

SDNC 3.5 RBS&TC/ Schmitz

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - SDNC · SDNC Women 3.5 Holiday T

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-20vs SDNC 3.5 Yule Tide @FRCC/ GlaserSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAlissa Ly / Laura Stern vs Peggy Semerdjian / Jaimy Clarkson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Witsken / Lim Kaiser vs Caroline Vance / Leanne Kiviharju6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-12-08vs SDNC 3.5 Sleigh-in' It @ KCP/ BuckySplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlissa Ly / Diane Vo vs April Guerieri / Amie Destremps6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCristina Gerardi / Julie Witsken vs Alisha Lapkewych / Molly Mayson0-6, 3-6
2022-12-01vs SDNC 3.5 Court Sleighers @PHA/ SukSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCristina Gerardi / Alissa Ly vs Amanda Clardy / Diane Silberman2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCynthia Stern / Julie Witsken vs Jill Twombly / Jennifer van Riet0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandra Sweat / Cynthia Stern vs Yanira Hernandez / Alena Khoroshansky3-6, 3-6
2022-11-18vs SDNC LLW 3.5 Frosty Ballers/ OttLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiane Vo / Julie Witsken vs Ana Mariela Gamiz / Whitney Ginter3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesJulie Witsken / Alissa Ly vs Jennifer Johnson / Kiersten Bousquet4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesAlissa Ly / Diane Vo vs Gina Goldstein / Analia Goode7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCynthia Stern / Cristina Gerardi vs Beth Piper / Tien Tran2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC Women 3.5 Holiday T have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Alissa Ly
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.40
Diane Vo
published 3.5
3.14
Cristina Gerardi
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
3.07
Cynthia Stern
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Emy Serazio
published 3
2.63
Julie Witsken
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
Laura Stern
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Witsken + Cristina Gerardi2341% gamesnot enough data
Alissa Ly + Julie Witsken224 matchesnot enough data
Alissa Ly + Cristina Gerardi314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alissa Ly
160W–70L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
3.5
Diane Vo
16W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3
Cristina Gerardi
155W–105L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%15%85%
3.14
3
Cynthia Stern
24W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Emy Serazio
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Julie Witsken
28W–37L career · 10 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.63
Laura Stern
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.