Teams

NAZ/Kolody/55 & over mxd/7.0

2024 Mixed 55 & Over - NAZ · 7.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-01-05vs PennaWon 21
L#1 DoublesKirsten Gunn / John Kolody vs Kristen Downs / Bob Guzley4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Tullis / Diego Constante vs Joanne Hopmeyer / Steven Danner6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSteven Riggs / Deborah Cavaliere vs Vicki Penna / Michael Chan6-2, 6-3
2025-01-05vs PennaWon 20
W#2 DoublesDiego Constante / Lisa Tullis vs Caroline Austin-Mathur / Steven Danner6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSteven Riggs / Deborah Cavaliere vs Michael Chan / Vicki Penna6-2, 6-3
2024-12-01vs PennaWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeborah Cavaliere / Steven Riggs vs Kristen Downs / Bob Guzley1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiego Constante / Lisa Tullis vs Michael Chan / Caroline Austin-Mathur6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJohn Kolody / Kirsten Gunn vs Steven Danner / Joanne Hopmeyer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-12-01vs PennaWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiego Constante / Lisa Tullis vs Kristen Downs / Bob Guzley6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Kolody / Kirsten Gunn vs Michael Chan / Caroline Austin-Mathur6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Cavaliere / Steven Riggs vs Steven Danner / Joanne Hopmeyer6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NAZ/Kolody/55 & over mxd/7.04093892
2Penna043920124

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Diego Constante
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Steven Riggs
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Kirsten Gunn
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
John Kolody
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Lisa Tullis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Deborah Cavaliere
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diego Constante + Lisa Tullis9065% games+5.1% vs expected
John Kolody + Kirsten Gunn9556% games−1.2% vs expected
Deborah Cavaliere + Steven Riggs404 matchesnot enough data
Diego Constante + Kirsten Gunn033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diego Constante
84W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
Steven Riggs
64W–59L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.49
Kirsten Gunn
68W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
John Kolody
62W–102L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
Lisa Tullis
47W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Deborah Cavaliere
37W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.