Teams

Bulnes - Salina

2024 KS 18 & Over Adult Indoor League · 4.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.12 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-03-17vs Kice - WichitaWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Johnson / CARY MORRIS vs Janice Price / Julie Ryan1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesClarissa Steele vs Sharon Schlehuber1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-17vs Kice - WichitaLost 01
L#1 DoublesClarissa Steele / CARY MORRIS vs Allison Kaster / Convallaria Wong0-6, 2-6
2024-03-10vs Bettis - TopekaLost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Johnson / Megan Kingry vs Heather Fay / Teresa Oneal6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMacY Mathew vs Melissa Goodman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Mathew / Clarissa Steele vs Karen Speaks / Destiny MacE0-6, 2-6
2024-03-10vs Bettis - TopekaWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Johnson / Clarissa Steele vs Heather Fay / Teresa Oneal6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmy Mathew vs Melissa Goodman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Kingry / MacY Mathew vs Destiny MacE / Karen Speaks7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-02-04vs Kice - WichitaSplit 11
W#1 SinglesClarissa Steele vs Sharon Schlehuber6-3, 4-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTia Westling / Hayden Bellamy vs Julie Ryan / Convallaria Wong3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-04vs Kice - WichitaLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Johnson / Tia Westling vs Janice Price / Deborah Zrubek3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHayden Bellamy vs Samantha Thomas3-6, 4-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVanessa Burns / Clarissa Steele vs Allison Kaster / Julie Ryan2-6, 0-6
2024-01-28vs KS/Osborne - TopekaLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Johnson / Tia Westling vs Phyllis Norman / Jackie Gehrke3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesClarissa Steele vs Jill Burgdorfer1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesVanessa Burns / Hayden Bellamy vs Pritha Prasad / Elizabeth Roberts1-6, 2-6
2024-01-28vs KS/Osborne - TopekaLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Johnson / Tia Westling vs Jackie Gehrke / Phyllis Norman6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHayden Bellamy vs Jill Burgdorfer3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesClarissa Steele / Vanessa Burns vs Pritha Prasad / Elizabeth Roberts2-6, 2-6
2024-01-21vs Bettis - TopekaWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Johnson / MacKenzie Morris vs Michelle Bettis / Teresa Oneal6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHayden Bellamy vs Valerie Glotzbach1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMegan Kingry / Tia Westling vs Melissa Goodman / Heather Fay4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-01-21vs Bettis - TopekaWon 21
L#1 DoublesMacKenzie Morris / Amy Mathew vs Michelle Bettis / Heather Fay2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMegan Kingry vs Melissa Goodman6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHayden Bellamy / Tia Westling vs Valerie Glotzbach / Teresa Oneal6-2, 7-5
2024-01-07vs KS/Osborne - TopekaLost 03
L#1 DoublesMegan Kingry / MacKenzie Morris vs Michelle Gifford / Jackie Gehrke5-7, 2-4
L#1 SinglesClarissa Steele vs Snezhana Solovey2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Johnson / Tia Westling vs Brittany Osborne / Jena Dick2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-01-07vs KS/Osborne - TopekaWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Johnson / MacKenzie Morris vs Michelle Gifford / Jackie Gehrke7-6, 4-1
W#1 SinglesMegan Kingry vs Jena Dick6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVanessa Burns / Clarissa Steele vs Brittany Osborne / Snezhana Solovey3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ritchie/Vennavelli - Wichita75211534250
2Bulnes - Salina57152147338
3Vennavelli - Genesis Rock Road, Winter Team 1000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hayden Bellamy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.91
Amy Mathew
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
MacY Mathew
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
CARY MORRIS
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.30
Clarissa Steele
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
Karley Benson
published
MacKenzie Morris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Kingry
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rafael Bulnes
published
Tia Westling
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Vanessa Burns
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Mathew + MacY Mathew1539% games−2.7% vs expected
Clarissa Steele + CARY MORRIS134 matchesnot enough data
Megan Kingry + MacKenzie Morris033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hayden Bellamy
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Amy Mathew
89W–121L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.91
MacY Mathew
34W–64L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
CARY MORRIS
54W–82L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Clarissa Steele
68W–80L career · 14 lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.30
Karley Benson
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
MacKenzie Morris
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Kingry
4W–4L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rafael Bulnes
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tia Westling
1W–6L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vanessa Burns
42W–23L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.