Teams

Thomas/Nashville

2024 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Women - Monday AM

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0 Women - Monday AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hirst/Nashville8024820234
2Thomas/Nashville7125716213
3Brooks/Burton/Nashville71221027240
4Yung-Okamoto/Nashville6224822246
5Brown/Nashville62201231271
6Pittman/Hamlin/Nashville53201227244
7Wallace/Nashville53211129272
8Hicks/Polk/Nashville53171537286
9Burnstein/Stringfellow/Nashville1772553350
10Salada/Nashville1772553363
11Collins/Baumgartner/Nashville1772555373
12Blevins/Nashville0842857375

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Celine DAmore
published 4
3.77
Michelle Hamman
published
Clair Cochran
published 4
3.66
Gretchen Olson
published 4
3.65
Lavanya Nagineni
published
3.61
Mollie Alvarez
published
3.60
Alicia Zimmer
published 4
3.59
Michelle Reyzer
published
3.58
Missy Dunagan
published
3.57
Rachel Fogarty
published
3.57
Cari Blevins
published 4
3.55
Stacy Thomas
published
3.53
Lynn Butler
published
3.46
Traci Holton
published
3.32
Jolene Chen
published
Kristy Swailes
published
Ronelda Wessels
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cari Blevins + Rachel Fogarty6157% games+11.1% vs expected
Missy Dunagan + Mollie Alvarez7348% games+6.0% vs expected
Cari Blevins + Stacy Thomas1728% games−3.9% vs expected
Michelle Reyzer + Stacy Thomas0530% gamesnot enough data
Gretchen Olson + Mollie Alvarez224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Reyzer + Lynn Butler134 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Fogarty + Stacy Thomas044 matchesnot enough data
Gretchen Olson + Michelle Reyzer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celine DAmore
42W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
4.01
Michelle Hamman
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Clair Cochran
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Gretchen Olson
13W–21L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.66
Lavanya Nagineni
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Mollie Alvarez
22W–22L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Alicia Zimmer
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Michelle Reyzer
16W–41L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Missy Dunagan
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
Rachel Fogarty
15W–17L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Cari Blevins
18W–30L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
Stacy Thomas
20W–30L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
Lynn Butler
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.53
Traci Holton
23W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.46
Jolene Chen
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Kristy Swailes
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ronelda Wessels
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.