Teams

BHS - Kurtz

2022 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.86 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-07vs ACACWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Morris / Lesley Hock vs Dulcy Giuliano / Lynette Meynig6-1, 7-6
2022-05-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Morris / Lesley Hock vs Elizabeth Snyder / Ellen Hayes6-0, 6-2
2022-05-17vs ACACLost 01
L#2 DoublesLesley Hock / Wendy Merritt vs Lindsay Bazydlo / Ellen Welch3-6, 3-6
2022-05-03vs BHSC - HayesWon 20
W#1 SinglesLesley Hock vs Melissa Wiley6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Ratcliffe / Sue Frazier vs Paige Zelikow / Marcy MacGovern7-5, 6-3
2022-04-26Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLesley Hock vs Qian Cai1-6, 5-7
2022-04-12vs BHSC - HayesWon 10
W#3 DoublesSabrina Thompson / Lesley Hock vs Margaret Rose / Bridget Atwell7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Jillian Dann
published
Allison Evanow
published 4
3.71
3.68
Wendy Merritt
published
3.60
Cindy Grace
published 4
3.57
Lesley Hock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.36
Kate Stephenson
published
3.36
Katherine Morris
published
3.26
Sue Frazier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Jacalyn Bennett
published 3.5
Lindsay Phillips
published
Myriam Escanellas
published
Rachel Sligar
published
Sabrina Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Farrell Vangelopoulos + Kate Stephenson134 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Grace + Farrell Vangelopoulos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jillian Dann
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Allison Evanow
1W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Ratcliffe
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Farrell Vangelopoulos
10W–9L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Wendy Merritt
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Cindy Grace
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Lesley Hock
43W–49L career · 6 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Kate Stephenson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
3.36
Katherine Morris
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Sue Frazier
35W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Jacalyn Bennett
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Lindsay Phillips
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Myriam Escanellas
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Sligar
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sabrina Thompson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.