Teams

Apex:VolleyLlamas:Bowring

2023 ME Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.12 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-02-26vs Apex:TMV:ChampouxLost 13
L#1 DoublesPatrick Casey / David Dealaman vs James Paruk / Richard Pickering1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesXavier Claret Torrents vs Kazan Prindle6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBarry Brewster / Scott Hardy vs Doug Bearce / Roger Gagne6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJohn Powers / Chris Bowring vs David Champoux / Scott Steinberg1-6, 2-6
2023-02-11vs Apex:TMV:ChampouxLost 04
L#1 DoublesMichael Emmert / David Milliken vs Paul Jacy / Stephan Woods2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPatrick Casey vs Svetoslav Kirtchev1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChris Bowring / John Powers vs Sean Maguire / Richard McLeod2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarc Chadbourne / Barry Brewster vs David Champoux / Scott Steinberg5-7, 3-6
2023-01-28vs Apex:TMV:ChampouxLost 12
L#1 DoublesAleks Diamond-Stanic / Michael Emmert vs Trevor Thaxter / Sean Maguire6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPatrick Casey / David Milliken vs Paul Jacy / Steven Richard6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMarc Chadbourne / Chris Bowring vs Svetoslav Kirtchev / Scott Steinberg0-6, 1-6
2023-01-28vs Apex:TMV:ChampouxLost 13
W#1 DoublesAleks Diamond-Stanic / Michael Emmert vs Paul Jacy / Stephan Woods6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesXavier Claret Torrents vs Svetoslav Kirtchev4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBarry Brewster / Mike Coughlan vs Richard McLeod / Sean Maguire4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChris Bowring / John Powers vs Doug Bearce / James Paruk4-6, 0-6
2023-01-15vs Apex:TMV:ChampouxLost 13
W#1 DoublesAleks Diamond-Stanic / Patrick Casey vs Richard Pickering / Trevor Thaxter6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesXavier Claret Torrents vs Kazan Prindle5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMike Coughlan / David Milliken vs Roger Gagne / Gregg Lipton2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMichael Emmert / Chris Bowring vs David Champoux / Stephan Woods6-7, 2-6
2023-01-15vs Apex:TMV:ChampouxLost 13
L#1 DoublesAleks Diamond-Stanic / Patrick Casey vs Stephan Woods / Steven Richard4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Emmert vs Trevor Thaxter2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJonathan Swall / Jerome Faure vs Roger Gagne / Gregg Lipton4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Dealaman / David Milliken vs Doug Bearce / Richard Pickering7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Aleks Diamond-Stanic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
Michael Emmert
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
David Dealaman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
David Milliken
published 4
3.67
Xavier Claret Torrents
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.57
Patrick Casey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.51
Barry Brewster
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Jerome Faure
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.37
Marc Chadbourne
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.31
Mike Coughlan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Scott Hardy
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Chris Bowring
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
John Powers
published
Jonathan Swall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Emmert + Aleks Diamond-Stanic4359% games+8.3% vs expected
Scott Hardy + Jerome Faure7457% games+8.0% vs expected
Scott Hardy + Marc Chadbourne14456% games+1.9% vs expected
Chris Bowring + Patrick Casey1838% games+1.0% vs expected
Marc Chadbourne + Jerome Faure121153% games−3.3% vs expected
Chris Bowring + Jerome Faure1643% games−7.0% vs expected
Jonathan Swall + Jerome Faure033 matchesnot enough data
Patrick Casey + Aleks Diamond-Stanic213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aleks Diamond-Stanic
95W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
4.42
Michael Emmert
122W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
David Dealaman
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
David Milliken
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Xavier Claret Torrents
51W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
Patrick Casey
66W–59L career · 5 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Barry Brewster
9W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
Jerome Faure
207W–135L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
Marc Chadbourne
173W–147L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
Mike Coughlan
24W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Scott Hardy
155W–73L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Chris Bowring
65W–125L career · 11 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Powers
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jonathan Swall
11W–24L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.