Teams

STC ASAAD

2023 FW USTA · USPTA Adult Fall Ladies N

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for USPTA Adult Fall Ladies N have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Cathy Parsons
published 3.5
3.44
KIM ASAAD
published
3.42
Audrey Baker
published 3.5
3.38
Stacey Belkin
published
Cheryl Harrison
published 3.5
3.18
Noreen Kane
published
3.16
Jane Steffenburg
published
2.82
Sharon Harris
published
Denise Coleman
published 3
2.68
Petra Heagy
published
Lois Green
published
Sara Wilburn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Baker + KIM ASAAD10069% games+9.0% vs expected
Petra Heagy + Sharon Harris044 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Parsons + Noreen Kane213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cathy Parsons
25W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
KIM ASAAD
17W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Audrey Baker
15W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
Stacey Belkin
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Cheryl Harrison
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Noreen Kane
11W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Jane Steffenburg
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
Sharon Harris
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Denise Coleman
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Petra Heagy
13W–21L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
Lois Green
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sara Wilburn
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.