Teams

OPEN

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-28vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Mubarak / Tracey Belmont vs Patsy Fischer / Isabel Cunningham6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEmma Poindexter / Parker Casler vs Courtney Hammontree / Heather Wilson3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSavannah Johnson / Cheri Arnsdorff vs Rebecca Bender / Elsa Roland0-6, 1-6
2025-02-07vs GomesSpurginLost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Mubarak / Kimberly Nelson vs Linda Roback / Paola Martinez3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChelsea Grindstaff / Joy Bray vs Jenna Gomes / Carolina Lyngh4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKetki Sheth / Misty Gouge vs Ann Wegner / Ashley Hoskins0-6, 0-6
2025-02-02vs Yoder/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeah Sullivan / Tracey Belmont vs Lauren Huston / Tracy Collins3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Warden / Parker Casler vs Rachel Waddell / Keri Root1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKetki Sheth / Cheri Arnsdorff vs Hilary Brooks / Ashley Tipton6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-31vs McElrathSarratSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEmma Poindexter / Chelsea Grindstaff vs Suzanne Carswell / Monica Sarrat3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSavannah Johnson / Cheri Arnsdorff vs Amy McCleary / Sarah Buchanan3-6, 3-6
2025-01-24vs McKeehanLost 12
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Mubarak / Kimberly Nelson vs Ashli Christen / Heather McKeehan6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesParker Casler / Joy Bray vs Maria Willard / Emily Miner7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSavannah Johnson / Misty Gouge vs Annabel Sims / Betsy Wood1-6, 4-6
2025-01-17vs HendersonLost 12
W#1 DoublesLeah Sullivan / Suzanne Mubarak vs Thuy Duong / Julia Connor6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChelsea Grindstaff / Katie Warden vs Kayla O'Connor / Carly OConnor4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCheri Arnsdorff / Ketki Sheth vs Emilyn Bellingrath / Lindsey Gallaher1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OPEN000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Suzanne Mubarak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Tracey Belmont
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Emma Poindexter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Parker Casler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Cheri Arnsdorff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.31
Ketki Sheth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Chelsea Grindstaff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.15
Savannah Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.91
Misty Gouge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joy Bray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Warden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Leah Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheri Arnsdorff + Ketki Sheth4155% games+10.1% vs expected
Parker Casler + Katie Warden123 matchesnot enough data
Cheri Arnsdorff + Savannah Johnson123 matchesnot enough data
Misty Gouge + Savannah Johnson123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Warden + Chelsea Grindstaff033 matchesnot enough data
Ketki Sheth + Savannah Johnson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Mubarak
23W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Tracey Belmont
22W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
3
Emma Poindexter
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Parker Casler
6W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Cheri Arnsdorff
33W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
Ketki Sheth
18W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31
3
Chelsea Grindstaff
6W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.23
Savannah Johnson
13W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Misty Gouge
2W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
>99%<1%0%
1.91
Joy Bray
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Warden
2W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leah Sullivan
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.