Teams

Arnold - Honey Deuces

2025 Harrisonburg Combo · Harrisonburg Combo 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-06vs Tabb - Dare DoublesWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Wylie / Elaine Dunaway vs Nicole Dewald / Sharon Dove4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBeth Arnold / Eileen Waterhouse vs Janet Fulton / Teresa Fisher6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesOris Griffin / Mari Kyle vs Leslie Dutt / Mary Toro2-6, 3-6
2025-11-02vs Tabb - Dare DoublesWon 21
W#1 DoublesEileen Waterhouse / Mari Kyle vs Sarah Donaire / Leslie Dutt4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Albertson / Beth Arnold vs Sharon Dove / Janet Fulton6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesOris Griffin / Melinda Noland vs Kimberly Ridings / Peggy Tabb5-7, 4-6
2025-10-16vs Tabb - Dare DoublesWon 20
W#1 DoublesEileen Waterhouse / Mary Witt vs Sharon Dove / Leslie Dutt6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElaine Dunaway / Emily Wylie vs Janet Fulton / Teresa Fisher6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-05vs Tabb - Dare DoublesWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeth Arnold / Eileen Waterhouse vs Nicole Dewald / Sarah Donaire6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMelinda Noland / Mari Kyle vs Teresa Fisher / Leslie Dutt6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesElaine Dunaway / Oris Griffin vs Janet Fulton / Peggy Tabb6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Harrisonburg Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emily Wylie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.46
Eileen Waterhouse
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Beth Arnold
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.70
Elaine Dunaway
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Laura Albertson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mari Kyle
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Witt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Melinda Noland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Oris Griffin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emily Wylie
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Eileen Waterhouse
9W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Beth Arnold
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Elaine Dunaway
5W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Laura Albertson
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mari Kyle
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Witt
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melinda Noland
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Oris Griffin
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.