Teams

Eddy/Memphis

2023 Adult 55 & Over-Memphis · 4.0 Women 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Margo Gruen
published
3.54
Melinda Gillespie
published
3.46
Robin Thomas
published
3.44
Barb Lansky
published 3.5
3.40
Sheila Carro
published
3.24
Gina Simonetti
published
3.23
Catherine Eddy
published 3.5
3.23
Dana Deviney
published 4
3.18
Jennifer Goodnight
published
3.16
Gabriela Harsanyi
published
3.13
Jennifer OConnell
published
2.96
Kelly Kitabchi
published
Meg Galvin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Thomas + Jennifer OConnell5354% games−3.7% vs expected
Robin Thomas + Catherine Eddy404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margo Gruen
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Melinda Gillespie
15W–28L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
Robin Thomas
38W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Barb Lansky
38W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
3.44
Sheila Carro
24W–36L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Gina Simonetti
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Catherine Eddy
25W–12L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
4
Dana Deviney
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.23
Jennifer Goodnight
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.18
Gabriela Harsanyi
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.16
Jennifer OConnell
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
Kelly Kitabchi
12W–18L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Meg Galvin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.