Teams

DAllen

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-10vs Sheehan 18+Lost 13
L#1 DoublesTracey Carlin / Natalie Regan vs Ashley Kerr / Kris Wordsworth6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSusie EL-Kaissi vs Mindy Edwards6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLUCY LAV vs Amy Perry1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Allen / Angela Pleasants vs Martha Sanders / Nancy Harvin6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-05-03vs YBarthes 3.5 18Won 31
W#1 DoublesDiane Allen / Angela Pleasants vs Maggie Ouellette / Evelyn Andino4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSusie EL-Kaissi vs Tassie McGannon6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTracey Carlin / LUCY LAV vs Heather Bilderback / Kelly Huffstetler6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTara Spina / Sharon Gerald vs Yuliya Barthes / Amanda Bauer6-7, 2-6
2022-04-26vs SCole18+Split 22
L#1 DoublesDaphne Driscoll / Susie EL-Kaissi vs Chrissy Hederick / Andrea Miller5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAngela Pleasants vs Lilian Berridi-Urlaub0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNatalie Regan / Monica Collins vs Tina Stewart / Jodi Zorzi6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKate Pirrung / Tara Spina vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-19vs GFLYNNWon 40
W#1 DoublesDiane Allen / Angela Pleasants vs Jolyne Taylor / Holly Camak6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSusie EL-Kaissi vs Joanna Brooks3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNatalie Regan vs Kristen Welsh6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKate Pirrung / Tracey Carlin vs Kristi Wilson / Liz Woodall6-0, 6-1
2022-04-05vs MLaddWon 21
W#1 DoublesAngela Pleasants / Natalie Regan vs Kay Ruocchio / Holly Lotterhos7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLUCY LAV / Susie EL-Kaissi vs Jill David / Karin Reed7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKate Pirrung / Carrie O'Ferral vs Maggie LaPlante / Erica Rankin4-6, 2-6
2022-03-29vs IChappellSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMonica Collins / Natalie Regan vs Brooke Somers / Stacy Thiedeman7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSusie EL-Kaissi vs Jeanie White6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDiane Allen / Angela Pleasants vs Rachel Brown / Elizabeth Newton6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLUCY LAV vs Anna Kouba2-6, 6-7
2022-03-22vs CMcCullough18+Split 22
W#1 DoublesTracey Carlin / LUCY LAV vs Lynda Blelloch / Sarah Breazeale6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNatalie Regan vs Virginia Jenkins1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Allen / Tara Spina vs Noelle Jackson / Marissa Parrish2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAngela Pleasants vs Alison Cohen6-1, 6-2
2022-03-15vs KWalkerWon 30
W#1 DoublesTracey Carlin / Natalie Regan vs Julie Fleming / Shelia Knoll7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDiane Allen / Angela Pleasants vs Sharon Agresta / Lori Jones6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSusie EL-Kaissi / Daphne Driscoll vs Kimberly Walker / Britt Tolliver6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Tracey Carlin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.47
Susie EL-Kaissi
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.44
Angela Pleasants
usually #1 Singles 27%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.38
Natalie Regan
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.36
Kate Pirrung
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.25
LUCY LAV
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Ashley Walton
published 3.5
3.05
Tara Spina
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Sharon Gerald
published
2.72
Melissa Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Carlin + LUCY LAV12364% games+12.1% vs expected
Kate Pirrung + Susie EL-Kaissi11757% games+6.0% vs expected
Angela Pleasants + Ashley Walton3256% games+5.8% vs expected
LUCY LAV + Susie EL-Kaissi312060% games+1.9% vs expected
Angela Pleasants + Susie EL-Kaissi8360% games−0.9% vs expected
Natalie Regan + Susie EL-Kaissi9857% games−2.2% vs expected
Tara Spina + Susie EL-Kaissi13363% gamesnot enough data
Tara Spina + Angela Pleasants5463% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tracey Carlin
156W–108L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Susie EL-Kaissi
253W–127L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Angela Pleasants
189W–94L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Natalie Regan
160W–123L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Kate Pirrung
185W–118L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
LUCY LAV
231W–188L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ashley Walton
18W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3
Tara Spina
191W–125L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.05
Sharon Gerald
3W–18L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.87
Melissa Green
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.