Teams

Treviso Bay - K. Hamilton

2021 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-04vs COLLIER - Naples Reserve - L KeelyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Sams / Cheryl Rauch vs Dorothea Farmer / Jennifer Ball3-6, 6-7
2021-02-18vs Pelican Marsh - BishopLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarybeth Broderick / Denise Reilly vs Elizabeth Giannetti / Marell Kowalski2-6, 1-6
2021-02-11vs Naples Beach Club - L.JaksichLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Phyllis Case vs Jennifer Archie / Emily Dunn2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-02-04vs Bay Colony - O'MearaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaureen Sullivan / Cheryl Rauch vs Brenda Shields / Beverly Biltz4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Hamilton / Bobbie Mantey vs Sheri Abrams / Jyll Lilly6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-01-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Marybeth Broderick vs Kate McMeekan / Patricia Bardavid6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKathy Hamilton / Marybeth Broderick vs Kelly Deufel / Maureen Sexson6-3, 6-3
2021-01-07vs Village Walk Bonita - A. KremerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaureen Sullivan / Cheryl Rauch vs Betty Zink / Ann Kremer6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKathy Hamilton / Marybeth Broderick vs Patricia Dewan / Janice Lose3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Beverly Harmon
published 4
3.57
Phyllis Case
published
3.26
Denise Reilly
published 3.5
3.25
Cheryl Rauch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Bobbie Mantey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Marybeth Broderick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kathleen Barger
published
Kathy Hamilton
published
Mary Sams
published
Maureen Sullivan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Sams + Maureen Sullivan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beverly Harmon
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Phyllis Case
44W–33L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Denise Reilly
54W–37L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Cheryl Rauch
106W–90L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.25
3
Bobbie Mantey
53W–39L career · 1 line in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83
3.5
Marybeth Broderick
18W–68L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
91%9%<1%
2.83
Kathleen Barger
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathy Hamilton
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Sams
1W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Maureen Sullivan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.