Teams

Qualifier Team

2026 Foothills Mixed Doubles - 40 & over · 3.5 Mixed Doubles

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-30vs Diamonti/LHCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMindy Bolick / Kevin Lickman vs Tisha Zagaroli / Charlie Zagaroli6-2, 6-2
2026-07-23vs Diamonti/LHCC/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Womack / Sandra Reid vs Jason Harris / Beth Blair2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJosh Wood / Sandi Horyza vs Erika Rowland / Lawrence Thompson3-6, 2-6
2026-07-16vs Diamonti/LHCC/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKevin Lickman / Sandi Horyza vs Marsha Diamonti / Greg Diamonti6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMark Eckard / Sandra Reid vs Chris Lovern / Ryan Lovern2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Geyer/LHCC/Foothills1021216
2Qualifier Team0112428

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Mindy Bolick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Linda Shuford
published 3.5
3.31
Josh Wood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Mark Eckard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Robert Womack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Kevin Lickman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Sandra Reid
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Sandi Horyza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mindy Bolick
325W–117L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Linda Shuford
120W–80L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
Josh Wood
16W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Mark Eckard
49W–71L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Robert Womack
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Kevin Lickman
92W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Sandra Reid
12W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.95
3.5
Sandi Horyza
150W–210L career · 2 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.