Teams

Stacey/Murfreesboro

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Murfreesboro · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-06vs Forrest/MurfreesboroSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAshley Beckman / Susan Britt vs Ashley Hinesley / Madelyn Knowles1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Beckman vs Stephanie Ofenheusle4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-29vs Forrest/MurfreesboroLost 03
L#1 DoublesTiffany West / Holly Stacey vs Stephanie Ofenheusle / Sarah Baird0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAshley Beckman vs Hannah Harrison2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRhodora Sanchez / Andrea Oathout vs Lorie Dove / Vanessa Bui5-7, 0-6
2025-03-23vs Forrest/MurfreesboroLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Beckman / Ashley Beckman vs Megan Forrest / Sarah Baird3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTiffany West vs Vanessa Bui0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Stacey / Susan Britt vs Lorie Dove / Hannah Harrison2-6, 2-6
2025-03-16vs Forrest/MurfreesboroWon 21
L#1 DoublesRhodora Sanchez / Susan Britt vs Kendra Birtsch / Hannah Harrison0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAshley Beckman vs Vanessa Bui6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmanda Northcutt / Sarah Beckman vs Madelyn Knowles / Ashley Hinesley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-15vs Forrest/MurfreesboroLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Tilton / Andrea Oathout vs Kendra Birtsch / Hannah Harrison2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Beckman vs Vanessa Bui6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHolly Stacey / Ashley Beckman vs Kellie Sallis / Lorie Dove4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Forrest/Murfreesboro321051089
2Stacey/Murfreesboro2351023153

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.36
Sarah Beckman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Andrea Oathout
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.14
Rhodora Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.09
Ashley Beckman
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.03
Amanda Northcutt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.84
Holly Stacey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.64
Cindy Tilton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Susan Britt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tiffany West
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Beckman
7W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.36
2.5
Andrea Oathout
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhodora Sanchez
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.14
2.5
Ashley Beckman
1W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Amanda Northcutt
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Holly Stacey
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.84
2.5
Cindy Tilton
0W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.64
Susan Britt
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany West
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.