Teams

ACombs/KMacrone (BCC)

2023 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 5.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-10-11vs MFrancis/MSevigny (Carmel)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKate MacRone / Rachel Miller vs Catherine Bauer / Brittany Russell5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Natalie Corrigan vs Jennifer Byer / Kylie Holt6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-04vs HLee/SRock (Piper Glen)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKate MacRone / Rachel Miller vs Tyler Brody / Sarah Garner6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Natalie Corrigan vs Kandy Steiner / Allyson McDonough3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-09-27vs TAmos/MWolf (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKate MacRone / Diane Pugh vs Rhonda Tate / Lori Holman0-6, 0-6
2023-09-20vs VTolson/KPetras (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Margit Etzel vs Sheri Noot / Caroline Lattanzi2-6, 4-6
2023-09-13vs JBarton/PLaughlin (Blakeney)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKate MacRone / Rachel Miller vs Monica Larios / Monica Guerra2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Natalie Corrigan vs Paula Laughlin / Jena Barton6-2, 6-2
2023-09-06vs MFrancis/MSevigny (Carmel)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKate MacRone / Rachel Miller vs Maria Sevigny / Jessica Babinski6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNatalie Corrigan / Melodie Ohaus vs Catherine Bauer / Kylie Holt0-6, 1-6
2023-09-05vs HLee/SRock (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNatalie Corrigan / Melodie Ohaus vs Joanne Joliet / Hilary Lee5-7, 5-7
2023-08-23vs TAmos/MWolf (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Natalie Corrigan vs Jeri Zangmeister / Lori Holman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-16vs VTolson/KPetras (Firethorne)Won 10
W#1 DoublesGaye Holmes / Kate MacRone vs Courtney Slavin / Sheri Noot5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-09vs JBarton/PLaughlin (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Combs / Kate MacRone vs Jami Stone / Antoinette Tan4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Melodie Ohaus
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Gaye Holmes
published 3
2.80
Kate MacRone
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.54
Margit Etzel
published
2.51
Natalie Corrigan
published
2.48
Vonda Huss
published
2.37
Amy Combs
published 3
Carrie Baker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Corrigan + Margit Etzel2451% games+15.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Melodie Ohaus
98W–142L career · 15 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Gaye Holmes
8W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Kate MacRone
77W–124L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
Margit Etzel
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
2.54
Natalie Corrigan
8W–18L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.51
Vonda Huss
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.48
3
Amy Combs
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.37
Carrie Baker
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.