Teams

1-MPaul-Eno-18 8.0

2023 Eno River Mixed 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult Mixed 8.0 Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-19vs 4-TBrooks-Eno-18 8.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLaurie Straube / Madison Alexander vs Laura McNiven / Brandon Keisner1-6, 4-6
2023-07-07vs 7-SZIKSAI/SHANE-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaurie Straube / Mark Scherr vs Barry Gooch / Betsy Shane1-6, 1-6
2023-07-05vs 3-Rupert/Tomkins-CHTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesMadison Paul / Mark Scherr vs Leah Weinberger / JOE BERTON0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLaurie Straube / Lei Ji vs Elizabeth Heald / Donovan Khamphasong4-6, 1-6
2023-07-03vs 2-LBolger-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesMadison Paul / Mark Scherr vs Lauren Bolger / Joshua Collins7-5, 7-5
2023-06-12vs 7-SZIKSAI/SHANE-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatie Evans / Mark Scherr vs Luc Sanchez / Rebecca Reynolds4-6, 1-6
2023-06-05vs 5-HRoss-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesLei Ji / Laurie Straube vs Jack Hu / Heidi Ross2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Evans / Mark Scherr vs Carrie Guthrie / Steve Haine6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2023-05-22vs 6-APlachco-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaurie Straube / Ivan Ross vs Zoe Dubrow / Dash Rajarajhan3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult Mixed 8.0 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Mark Scherr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.81
Zachary Suozzo
published
3.80
Elizabeth Harvie
published 4
3.73
Karen Scherr
published
3.52
Madison Paul
published
3.51
Laurie Straube
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.51
Katie Evans
published
3.39
Ivan Ross
published 3.5
Lei Ji
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Scherr + Mark Scherr4261% games+2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mark Scherr
144W–67L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.89
Zachary Suozzo
12W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Elizabeth Harvie
26W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Karen Scherr
26W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Madison Paul
11W–30L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Laurie Straube
170W–122L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
Katie Evans
24W–26L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Ivan Ross
17W–16L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.39
Lei Ji
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.